The process of first writing a scientific paper and then responding to reviewer comments can be challenging and sometimes-some might say often-frustrating. In this personal view, I recount some of my experiences as an author, and I offer some strategies to write a paper and to then respond to comments from the people who reviewed it.

The editors of Fertility Research and Practice would like to thank all of our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 1 (2015).

CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS The editors of BMC Biotechnology would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 15 (2015).

CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS The editors of BMC Health Services Research would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 15 (2015).

aojnmb is striving for excellence. our journal is publishing its 4th volume of publication and we are delighted to observe on time publication of this journal with important scientific articles. on november 2015, 11th asia oceania congress of nuclear medicine & biology (aocnmb) was held in jeju international convention center (jicc) in korea with hundreds of participants and the abstracts of th...

© 2016 Leung. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes ...

I want to thank the reviewers (IE #108) for taking the time to make interesting and sometimes useful comments on my paper, “Cold Fusion from a Chemist’s Point of View.” This is the first and hopefully not the last time a proposed explanation of LENR has been reviewed publicly in such detail. The process is effective in revealing not only flaws but also how the ideas can be better explained to a...