purpose : to compare results of different methods for true corneal power determination and intraocular lens (iol) power calculation formulas in 10 eyes of 7 patients with previous radial keratotomy (rk) with or without astigmatic keratotomy methods : in this case series study, we determined the corneal power of 10 eyes of 7 patients who had undergone rk with or without astigmatic keratotomy wit...

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of axial length vergence formulas versus refractive vergence formulas for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pediatric aphakia. METHODS This retrospective comparative study, evaluated 31 eyes of 31 patients aged ≤3.5 years, who had undergone secondary IOL implantation. The median absolute error (MedAE) was compared between axial length vergence fo...

purpose: to report the results of different methods for true corneal power and intraocular lens (iol) power calculation in 10 eyes with previous radial keratotomy (rk) with or without astigmatic keratotomy. methods: in this case series including 10 eyes of 7 patients who had undergone rk with or without astigmatic keratotomy, we firstly determined corneal power using two methods: contact lens m...

Purpose. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.00 mm. Methods. This study reviewed 407 eyes of 219 patients with AL longer than 26.0 mm. The refractive prediction errors of IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II) using User Group f...

Efficacy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in a subset of Indian myopic population. Retrospectively reviewed 43 patients who underwent phacoemulsification with high axial length (AL) (>24.5 mm, range 24.75-32.35 mm). The power of the implanted intraocular lens (IOL) was used to calculate the predicted post-operative refractive error by four formulas: Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff (SRK II)...

purpose: in the present study we have tried to find the most reliable intraocular lens (iol) power calculation formula in patients with keratoconus (kcn) and cataract. methods: in a prospective case series between october 2010 and march 2012, eligible patients with cataract and kcn underwent phacoemulsification with iol implantation. preoperatively, based on iol master keratometric data iol pow...

purpose: to describe the biometric changes and their effect on intraocular lens (iol) power calculation after trabeculectomy and to compare the accuracy of four formulas namely srk/ii, srk/t, holladay and hoffer q for iol power calculation in these patients. methods: thirty-four eyes of 31 glaucoma patients who were scheduled for primary trabeculectomy were enrolled. a non-contact biometry devi...

PURPOSE To analyze the accuracy of the Holladay 2 formula, which has been proposed as an improvement over the original Holladay formula. METHODS This retrospective analysis comprised 317 eyes operated on by 1 surgeon using 1 technique and 1 intraocular lens style in a specialty practice. Because the Holladay 2 formula has yet to be published, its accuracy can only be analyzed using the commer...

purpose : to evaluate the accuracy of the two methods the clinical history method (chm), and the contact lens method (clm), in refractive corneal power determination and comparing the accuracy of srk ii, srk t and holladay ii (h ii) formulas for intraocular lens (iol) power calculation in patients who had laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik) surgery for myopia with or without astigmatism method...

BACKGROUND To evaluate how differences in ocular biometry affects the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and Haigis intraocular lens power calculation formulae predictions. METHODS This study was performed on 91 eyes of 91 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Ocular biometry values were measured using the IOL Master 500, and intraocular lens (IOL) power was calculated using the Haigi...