Geer et al. (2004) provided an interesting comparison between passive dosimetry measures and biomonitoring for chlorpyrifos (CP) exposure in pesticide workers. However, they made a questionable assumption of a 3% dermal absorption factor (DAF) for CP, stating: ‘[The] study by Nolan et al. (1984), supports the use of a 3% DAF, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accepted value, whereas Kri...