نتایج جستجو برای: reviewer
تعداد نتایج: 6805 فیلتر نتایج به سال:
Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments, little has been reported about the decision-making processes used by reviewers. One key attribute likely to be important for decision-making is reviewer expertise. Recent data from an experimental blinded review utilizing a direct measure of expertise has found that closer intellectual distances between...
Thank you again for your patience and once more, apologies for the unusual delay with reviewing your submission on Top1 damage processing at genomic ribonucleotides. We have now finally received the complete set of reviewer comments, and I am happy to inform you that all three referees consider this work interesting and important and would be supportive of publication pending adequate addressin...
Author's response to reviews: I have made all of the changes suggested by Reviewer #1 and Reviewer #2 had no suggestions.
Responses to previous reviews This LTREB proposal was submitted in January, 2008 and was not funded. The reviewer and panel comments were very helpful in drafting a revision and in contemplating the long-term research goals of the PI. All reviewer comments prompted changes in this proposal; the most notable concerns and criticisms (italicized and shortened) from the panel summary are directly a...
We thank the reviewer for the appraisal and suggestions, which have helped us to improve the manuscript. We have carefully tried to address the issues raised and to revise the paper accordingly. In the revision we have been able to incorporate nearly all the suggestions of the referees as explained in our responses to each reviewer. Below the essence of the questions and suggestions of the revi...
Reviewer 2 also feels that some conclusions are invalid due to experimental flaws. Again, without going into detail I would mention his/her perplexities on the conclusion drawn from the immunoprecipitation experiments depicted in Fig. 2. Additionally, Reviewer 2 suggests a number of crucial experiments required to show that PRL-3 mediates up regulation of c-Jun through JNK/ERK. This Reviewer al...
OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to determine which manuscript reviewer characteristics are most strongly associated with reviewer performance as judged by editors of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR). MATERIALS AND METHODS At the AJR, manuscript reviews are rated by the journal editors on a subjective scale from 1 (lowest) to 4, on the basis of the value, thoroughness, and pu...
Instructors and researchers of peer review would benefit from a consistent way of characterizing peer review among students. One factor that can affect peer review is reviewer bias. For example, students may give biased assessments if some reviewers are lenient and others stringent. Accordingly, statistical models of peer review should account for reviewer bias. We present work in progress comp...
OBJECTIVES To assess whether reports from reviewers recommended by authors show a bias in quality and recommendation for editorial decision, compared with reviewers suggested by other parties, and whether reviewer reports for journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models differ with regard to report quality and reviewer recommendations. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of the qua...
Title: Unexpected collateral impact after out of hospital resuscitation using LUCAS System Authors: Jasmin Hasmik Shahinian ([email protected]) Jonas Quitt ([email protected]) Mark Wiese ([email protected]) Friedrich Eckstein ([email protected]) Oliver Reuthebuch ([email protected]) Version: 1 Date: 04 Aug 2017 Author’s response to reviews: Answers to Reviewers Reviewer 1Commen...
نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال
با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید