This paper is concerned with an intriguing difference between Japanese and English involving the progressive form be V-ing and the -te iru form as well as the passive constructions in the two languages. Some of the complex semantic properties of the -te iru construction in Japanese are discussed in Ogihara (1998), where I present a proposal to account for the multiple interpretations associated...

We propose an approach to Japanese predicate argument structure analysis exploiting argument position and type. In particular, we propose the following two methods. First, in order to use information in the sentences in preceding context of the predicate more effectively, we propose an improved similarity measure between argument positions which is more robust than a previous co-reference-based...

Existing methods for Japanese predicate argument structure (PAS) analysis identify case arguments of each predicate without considering interactions between the target PAS and others in a sentence. However, the argument structures of the predicates in a sentence are semantically related to each other. This paper proposes new methods for Japanese PAS analysis to jointly identify case arguments o...

We describe here a theory of semantic composition, which integrates referent systems into argument structure. The main idea is that argument structure is the key component in linguistic signs, and that it provides the interface between syntax and semantics. To make this idea work for language, referent systems as defined in Vermeulen (1995) have been used. Referent systems (RS) are based on the...

Freeman’s argument structure approach (1991, revised in 2011) makes up for some deficiencies of the standard approach and the Toulmin model respectively. It clarifies Toulmin’s dim understanding of modal qualifiers, not only can characterize a complicated argument that consists of multiple sub-arguments, but also can reflect the dialectical tier of an argument better and more precisely. Meanwhi...

In a Principles and Parameters syntax framework sentences are derived by two operations, merger and movement. Merger takes two categories as input (e.g., V and NP) and merges them into a single, higher-order category (e.g., VP). There are, however, constraints on the categories that can be merged successfully. Consider the following pairs: 1a. [NP The girl] sneezed 1b. *[NP The girl] sneezed [N...

1 The Problem Argument structure has two faces, semantic and syntactic. On the semantic side, argument structure represents the core participants in events (states, processes) designated by a single predicator. From this point of view it appears as a type of representation of event structure. On the syntactic side, argument structure represents the minimal information needed to characterize the...

Manning, C.D. and Sag, I. A. 1998 Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding Nordic Journal of Linguistics This paper develops within HPSG a model of grammar with two syntactic levels, valence lists and argument structure, at which sentences may have di erent representations: syntactically ergative and Western Austronesian languages are distinctive by allowing di erent prominence orderings betwee...

We present a tool developed for annotating corpora with argument structure representations. The presentation focuses on the architecture of the annotation scheme and a number of techniques for increasing the efficiency and accuracy of annotation. Among others, we show how the assignment of grammatical functions can be automatised using standard part-of-speech tagging methods. 1 T h e A n n o t ...

In the present paper, a translational model to psychoanalyze the cyberspace is presented with the argument that cyberspace is a translated version of human unconscious that projects both our unfulfilled desires and suppressed anxieties. This Freudian-based line of argument is followed by Lacanian (1950s)and Zizekian (2004) psychoanalysis to problematize the digitalization of Oedipus complex and...