students’ evaluation of Congruence within Teaching-Learning Environment of Undergraduate Courses at Shiraz University

The Purpose Of This Study Was To Students’ Evaluation Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environment Of Undergraduate Courses At Shiraz University.  The Study Population Consisted Of All Undergraduate Courses Students Of Different Educational Groups At Shiraz University. 294 Participants Were Selected Using "Multistage Cluster Sampling” Method. Research Instruments Consisted Of Researcher Made Questionnaire Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environment Based On ETL Project (2005). The Results Showed That:  1) All Of Dimensions Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environments Was Lower Than The Adequate Level And Dimensions Including Congruence Of Course Organization & Management  And Congruence Of Assessment & Feedback Were Lower Than The Acceptable Level Of Competence, Also Congruence With Students' Backgrounds, Knowledge & Aspirations and Congruence Of  Learning Support And Teaching-Learning Activities Were  Higher Than The Acceptable Level Of Competence. 2) There Is A Significant Difference Between The Dimensions Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environments Of Undergraduate Courses At Shiraz University From The Perspective Of Students. 3) From The Perspective Of Students Of Different Educational Groups, There Is A Significant Difference Between The Dimensions Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environments Of Undergraduate Courses At Shiraz University. 4) From The Perspective Of Male And Female Students, There Isn’t A Significant Difference Between The Dimensions Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environments Of Undergraduate Courses At Shiraz University. 5) From The Perspective Of Students Of Different Educational Years, There Is A Significant Difference Between The Dimensions Of Congruence Within Teaching-Learning Environments Of Undergraduate Courses At Shiraz University.