Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Cusp Coverage with Composite Versus Unsupported Enamel Reinforced with Composite in Posterior Dental Restorations

نویسندگان

  • M Emami Arjomand Assistant professor of Department of restorative dentistry,dental branch, Islamic azad university,Tehran,Iran
  • SH Jalalian Department of restorative dentistry,dental branch, Islamic azad university,Tehran,Iran
چکیده مقاله:

Background and aim: Efficient bonding techniques should be employed for strengthening tooth structure. Whether to preserve intact dental tissue or to sacrifice some undermined parts can still be challenging. We aimed to evaluate the fracture strength of cusp coverage with composite versus unsupported enamel reinforced with composite in posterior restorations. Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, over-impressions were made from 36 sound human maxillary premolars using bleaching shields. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=12): group 1) intact teeth, group 2) teeth with MOD cavities without cusp coverage, and group 3) teeth with MOD cavities and 1.5 mm of buccal and palatal cusp coverage. Wide MOD cavities were prepared such that only 1 mm of intact enamel was left unsupported at margins. The cavities were restored using light-cure glass ionomer and P60 composite using the over-impressions to achieve the normal tooth anatomy. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for a week, and their fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. The load at fracture was recorded in Newton (N). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) of fracture load was 1834.62±104.04 N in group 1, 750.34±147.46 N in group 2, and 1211.30±210.85 N in group 3. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (P=0.001). Likewise, Tukey’s test showed that the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Using composite in restoring unsupported enamel must be combined with cusp coverage to increase fracture strength.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Role of cusp coverage in the protection of unsupported enamel in posterior composite restorations

Role of cusp coverage in the protection of unsupported enamel in posterior composite restorations Dr. A. Pahlavan* /Dr. AH. Taheri** *-Assistant professor of Operative Dentistry Dept-Faculty of Dentistry- Tehran University of Medical Sciences. **- Dentist. Background and aim: Removal of unsupported enamel is one of Block's important principles in cavity preparation. The aim of this study was to...

متن کامل

Fracture behavior of single-structure fiber-reinforced composite restorations

Objective: The applications of single-structure fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) in restorative dentistry have not been well reported. This study aimed to clarify the static mechanical properties of anterior crown restorations prepared using two types of single-structure FRC. Materials and methods: An experimental crown restoration was designed for an upper anterior incisor. The restorations we...

متن کامل

Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.

BACKGROUND Composite resins have esthetic properties; they join the ability to preserve and reinforce sound tooth structure. Conservation is becoming popular for both small to medium defects and more compromised teeth. PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of Class II cuspal coverage direct composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients, 18 years or ol...

متن کامل

Fracture strength of Class II composite resin restorations.

T he superior physical properties of composite resins have aroused the possibility of their use beyond the accepted indications for acrylic resin and silicate cement. The literature has suggested the use of composite resin for Class I,‘m4 Class II,” and Class IV39 * restorations. Other reports advocated the use of composite resin or tested the influence of pins on the physical properties of com...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده

{@ msg_add @}


عنوان ژورنال

دوره 3  شماره 4

صفحات  27- 32

تاریخ انتشار 2018-10

با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.

کلمات کلیدی

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023