Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
Authors
Abstract:
The classification of mental disorders has long been the subject of controversy among mental health professionals. Despite a Significant expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their processes and components remains rudimentary. This article provides descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder: Two major diagnostic manuals -the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) that prepares a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorders. It is identified four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying the mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; Categories or dimensions, whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, the common purpose of all three is reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder by better understanding and proper classification.
similar resources
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and the DSM--Two Methodological Approaches to Mental Health Diagnosis.
The distinction between the approaches represented by theDSM and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) does not lie in the choice between categorical and dimensional diagnosis.1 Every dimensional diagnosis can be converted to a corresponding categorical one by judiciously applying some dichotomization rule. Every categorical diagnosis canbe converted to a corresponding dimensional one, for example, b...
full textSix Years of Research on the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Initiative: A Systematic Review
Six years have passed since the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) in the United States launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative. The RDoC introduces a framework for research on the biology of mental illness that integrates research findings across multiple levels of information. The framework outlines constructs that represent specific quantifiable dimensions of behavior...
full textClashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC.
Since at least the middle of the past century, one overarching model of psychiatric classification has reigned supreme, namely, that of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (herein referred to as DSM-ICD). This DSM-ICD approach embraces an Aristotelian view of mental disorders as largel...
full textA comparison of DSM and ICD classifications of mental disorder
Although diagnosis in psychiatry leads to a lot of argument – and the extent of this dis satisfaction is expressed by an international campaign initiated by Sami Timimi (2011) on the Critical Psychiatry Network UK to abolish the ICD and DSM classifications altogether – most psychiatrists regard classification as having some value. A good class ification provides information about the causes of ...
full textDSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches.
BACKGROUND The development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) and ICD-11 has led to reconsideration of diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys allow investigation of the implications of the changing criteria compared to DSM-IV and ICD-10. METHODS WMH Surveys in 13 countries asked responde...
full textAdjustment disorder: implications for ICD-11 and DSM-5.
Adjustment disorder has been a recognised disorder for decades but has been the subject of little epidemiological research. Now researchers have identified the prevalence of adjustment disorder in primary care, and found general practitioner recognition very low but with high rates of antidepressant prescribing. Possible reasons for the seemingly low prevalence, recognition rate and inappropria...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 17 issue 1
pages 257- 281
publication date 2019-03
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
No Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023