Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers

Authors

  • Esther S. Mot CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands
  • Ilaria Mosca Division of Health Systems and Public Health, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark | Ecorys Netherlands B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Joost J.G. Wammes Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Patrick P.T. Jeurissen Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Philip J. van der Wees Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract:

Background The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the EU’s European Semester.   Methods This paper examines challenges related to the financial- and organizational sustainability of LTC systems in the EU. We combined a targeted literature review and a descriptive selected country analysis of: (1) public- and private funding; (2) informal care and externalities; and (3) the possible role of technology in increasing productivity. Countries were selected via purposive sampling to establish a cohort of country cases covering the spectrum of differences in LTC systems: public spending, private funding, informal care use, informal care support, and cash benefits.   Results The aging of the population, the increasing gap between availability of informal care and demand for LTC, substantial market failures of private funding for LTC, and fiscal imbalances in some countries, have led to structural reforms and enduring pressures for LTC policy-makers across the EU. Our exploration of national policies illustrates different solutions that attempt to promote fairness while stimulating efficient delivery of services. Important steps must be taken to address the sustainability of LTC. First, countries should look deeper into the possibilities of complementing public- and private funding, as well as at addressing market failures of private funding. Second, informal care externalities with spill-over into neighboring policy areas, the labor force, and formal LTC workers, should be properly addressed. Thirdly, innovations in LTC services should be stimulated to increase productivity through technology and process innovations, and to reduce costs.   Conclusion The analysis shows why it is difficult for EU Member State governments to meet all their goals for sustainable LTC, given the demographic- and fiscal circumstances, and the complexities of LTC systems. It also shows the usefulness to learn from policy design and implementation of LTC policy in other countries, within and outside the EU. Researchers can contribute by studying conditions, under which the strategies explored might deliver solutions for policy-makers

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

The Evolution of Long-term Care Programs; Comment on “Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan”

The need for long-term care (LTC) represents a “new social risk,” one that overlaps with and complements systems of care that pre-date such programs, complicating LTC program design. This commentary expands on Ikegami’s discussion of how these structural factors must be accommodated, as well as historical and cultural factors that influence public expectations of such a...

full text

Financing Long-term Care: The Role of Culture and Social Norms; Comment on “Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan”

Based on the experiences of Japan and Germany, Ikegami argues that middle-income countries should introduce public long-term care insurance (LTCi) at an early stage, before benefits have expanded as a result of ad hoc policy decisions to win popular support. The experience of the Netherlands, however, shows that an early introduction of public LTCi may not prevent, but ...

full text

Political and Cultural Foundations of Long-term Care Reform; Comment on “Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan”

This paper comments on Naoki Ikegami’s editorial entitled “Financing long-term care: lessons from Japan.” Adding to the editorial, this paper focuses on analyzing the political and cultural foundations of long-term care (LTC) reform. Intergenerational solidarity and inclusive, prudential public deliberation are needed for the establishment or reform of LTC systems. Amon...

full text

Long-term care and federal policy.

A major deficiency of national health care policy is the lack of a structured and comprehensive system of long-term care. A review of existing federal programs reveals that substantial resources are being expended to care for the elderly. Program structures and requirements, however, are frequently skewed toward institutional care to the exclusion of more appropriate home- and community-based s...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 6  issue 4

pages  195- 205

publication date 2017-04-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023