Suhrawardi on Syllogisms

author

سید ضیاء موحد عضو هیات علمی موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران

Abstract:

This article doesn't have abstract

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Already have an account?login

similar resources

suhrawardi’s logic of the hikmat al-ishraq is basically modal. so to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. in my previous paper ‘suhrawardi on syllogisms’(3) i discussed the former in detail. the present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. on the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositions and a...

full text

Parry Syllogisms

Parry discusses an extension of Aristotle’s syllogistic that uses four nontraditional quantifiers. We show that his conjectured decision procedure for validity for the extended syllogistic is correct even if syllogisms have more than two premises. And we axiomatize this extension of the syllogistic. 1 Background and motivation Parry [2] discusses an extension of the syllogistic in which sentenc...

full text

Wholly Hypothetical Syllogisms

In antiquity we encounter a distinction of two types of hypothetical syllogisms. One type are the 'mixed hypothetical syllogisms'. The other type is the one to which the present paper is devoted. These arguments went by the name of 'wholly hypothetical syllogisms'. They were thought to make up a self-contained system of valid arguments. Their paradigm case consists of two conditionals as premis...

full text

Comparative and quantitative syllogisms

Traditionally, syllogisms are arguments with two premises and one conclusion which are constructed by propositions of the form “All... are...” and “At least one... is...” and their respective negated versions. Unfortunately, the practical use of traditional syllogisms is quite restricted. On the one hand, the “All...” propositions are too strict, since a single counterexample suffices for falsi...

full text

Dynamic Reasoning with Qualified Syllogisms

A gualij%e~ syllogism is a classical Aristoteiean syllogism that has been “qualified” through the use of fuzzy quantifiers, likelihood modifiers, and usuality modifiers, e.g., “Most birds can Ry; Tweety is a bird; therefore, it is likely that Tweety can fly.” This paper introduces a formal logic Q of such syllogisms and shows how this may be employed in a system of nonmonotonj~ reasoning. In pr...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}

Journal title