Some improvements in fuzzy turing machines

author

Abstract:

In this paper, we improve some previous definitions of fuzzy-type Turing machines to obtain degrees of accepting and rejecting in a computational manner. We apply a BFS-based search method and some level’s upper bounds to propose a computational process in calculating degrees of accepting and rejecting. Next, we introduce the class of Extended Fuzzy Turing Machines equipped with indeterminacy states. These states are used to characterize the loops of classical Turing machines in a mathematical sense. In the sequel, as well as the notions of acceptable and decidable languages, we define the new notion of indeterminable language. An indeterminable language corresponds to non-halting runs of a machine. Afterwards, we show that there is not any universal extended machine; which concludes that these machines cannot solve the halting problem. Also, we show that our extended machines and classical Turing machines have the same computational power. Then, we define the new notion of semi-universality and prove that there exists a semi-universal extended machine. This machine can indeterminate the complement of classical halting problem. Moreover, to each r.e or co-r.e language, we correspond a language that is related to some extended fuzzy Turing machines.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Some Improvements in Fuzzy Turing Machines

In this paper we modify some previous definitions of fuzzy Turing machines to define the notions of accepting and rejecting degrees of inputs, computationally. We use a BFS-based search method and obtain an upper level bound to guarantee the existence of accepting and rejecting degrees. We show that fuzzy, generalized fuzzy and classical Turing machines have the same computational power. Next, ...

full text

Some relations between quantum Turing machines and Turing machines

For quantum Turing machines we present three elements: Its components, its time evolution operator and its local transition function. The components are related with the components of deterministic Turing machines, the time evolution operator is related with the evolution of reversible Turing machines and the local transition function is related with the transition function of probabilistic and...

full text

Classical Computability and Fuzzy Turing Machines

We work with fuzzy Turing machines (ftms) and we study the relationship between this computational model and classical recursion concepts such as computable functions, r.e. sets and universality. ftms are first regarded as acceptors. It has recently been shown in [23] that these machines have more computational power than classical Turing machines. Still, the context in which this formulation i...

full text

Some Mathematicians Are Not Turing Machines

A certain mathematician M, considering some hypothesis H, conclusion C and text P, can arrive at one of the following judgments: (1) P does not convince M of the fact that since H, it follows that C; (2) P is the proof that since H, it follows that C (judgment of the type"Proved"). Is it possible to replace such a mathematician with an arbitrary Turing machine? The paper provides a proof that t...

full text

Turing Tests with Turing Machines

Comparative tests work by finding the difference (or the absence of difference) between a reference subject and an evaluee. The Turing Test, in its standard interpretation, takes (a subset of) the human species as a reference. Motivated by recent findings and developments in the area of machine intelligence evaluation, we discuss what it would be like to have a Turing Test where the reference a...

full text

Zigzags in Turing Machines

We study one-head machines through symbolic and topological dynamics. In particular, a subshift is associated to the system, and we are interested in its complexity in terms of realtime recognition. We emphasize the class of one-head machines whose subshift can be recognized by a deterministic pushdown automaton. We prove that this class corresponds to particular restrictions on the head moveme...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 16  issue 1

pages  49- 60

publication date 2019-02-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023