Short to Mid-term Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injury
Authors
Abstract:
Background: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopedic injury leading to the tear of at least two ofthe major knee ligaments. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management of this debilitating condition.Regarding this, the present study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of single-stage multiligament reconstructionsurgery in patients with MLKI.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 41 consecutive MLKI patients who underwent surgicalreconstruction. Objective evaluation of the outcome included active extension and flexion. Furthermore, the subjectiveevaluation of the outcome was accomplished using the Lysholm scoring scale and International Knee DocumentationCommittee (IKDC) form in Persian. Postoperative complications were also recorded for all patients.Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.95±7.82 years. In addition, the mean follow-up period and themean time interval between the injury and surgery were recorded as 36.9±17.8 and 11.5±8.9 months, respectively. Themean Lysholm and IKDC scores were obtained as 86.9±11.5 and 70±18.7, respectively. The mean Lysholm and IKDCscores were not statistically different between the patients who underwent surgery less than 6 months after the injuryand those subjected to reconstruction 6 months postinjury (P=0.07 and P=0.3, respectively). Seven patients showedpostoperative restricted range of motion, which was resolved with physiotherapy. The only surgical complication waspopliteal artery injury.Conclusion: As the findings indicated, the single-stage reconstruction of MLKI provided an acceptable outcome.However, several aspects of this reconstruction, such as the timing of the surgery, still remain to be resolved in futureinvestigations.Level of evidence: IV
similar resources
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiligament Knee Injury
Methods: At a single institution, 68 patients were identified over a 10-year period as having MCL intervention in the setting of MLKI. Of these patients, 34 (50%) were successfully contacted via telephone to collect Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. A retrospective chart review of these subjects was also conducted to identify patient and surgical factors affe...
full textAcute Single-Stage Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injuries Using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to report our early outcome in the management of multiligament knee injuries with the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Between 2007 and 2010, 9 of 11 patients operated on for multiligament knee injuries were included in this study; 2 patients were excluded due to complicated neurovascular injuries, open knee dislocation...
full textPeroneal Nerve Injury after Multiligament Knee Injury
This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article witho...
full textControversies in the treatment of knee dislocations and multiligament reconstruction.
A systematic approach to evaluation and treatment is needed for the patient with knee dislocation. There is a paucity of high-level evidence on which to base treatment decisions. Reported controversies related to the treatment of the multiligament-injured knee include the selective use of arteriography for vascular assessment, serial physical examination with the ankle-brachial index, acute sur...
full textMultiligament Injury of the Knee. First Intrarticular or Posterior
This open‐access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ‐ NonCommercial ‐ No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article w...
full textthe effects of keyword and context methods on pronunciation and receptive/ productive vocabulary of low-intermediate iranian efl learners: short-term and long-term memory in focus
از گذشته تا کنون، تحقیقات بسیاری صورت گرفته است که همگی به گونه ای بر مثمر ثمر بودن استفاده از استراتژی های یادگیری لغت در یک زبان بیگانه اذعان داشته اند. این تحقیق به بررسی تاثیر دو روش مختلف آموزش واژگان انگلیسی (کلیدی و بافتی) بر تلفظ و دانش لغوی فراگیران ایرانی زیر متوسط زبان انگلیسی و بر ماندگاری آن در حافظه می پردازد. به این منظور، تعداد شصت نفر از زبان آموزان ایرانی هشت تا چهارده ساله با...
15 صفحه اولMy Resources
Journal title
volume 7 issue 4
pages 346- 353
publication date 2019-07-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023