Publication Ethics: A Case Series with Recommendations According to Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

publication ethics: a case series with recommendations according to committee on publication ethics (cope)

ethical misconduct is not a new issue in the history of science and literature. however, ethical misconducts in science have grown considerably in the modern era which is due to emphasis on the scientific proliferation in research institutes and gauging scientists according to their publications. in the current case series, several misconducts occurring over the previous years in mashhad univer...

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): guidelines on good publication practice.

Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

they receive inconclusive evidence of • research or publication misconduct by the authors there is evidence that the findings are • unreliable but the authors’ institution will not investigate the case they believe that an investigation • into alleged misconduct related to the publication either has not been, or would not be, fair and impartial or conclusive an investigation is underway but a •...

Committee on Publication Ethics. The COPE Report 1999. Guidelines on good publication practice.

Why the guidelines were developed COPE was founded in 1997 to address breaches of research and publication ethics. A voluntary body providing a discussion forum and advice for scientific editors, it aims to find practical ways of dealing with the issues, and to develop good practice. We thought it essential to attempt to define best practice in the ethics of scientific publishing. These guideli...

Committee on Publication Ethics 1997-2000.