Public exposure to natural radiation sources (Ramsar Case Study)
Authors
Abstract:
Introduction: Human beings are naturally exposed to ionizing radiation in any environment. There are two main contributors to radiation exposures from natural sources: cosmic rays, Cosmo genic radionuclides, and radioactive nuclides that originated in the earth's crust. According to the latest data provided by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the estimated worldwide average annual exposure to natural radiation sources is 2.4 mSv, and the most exposures are in the range of 1–13 mSv/a. There are several small areas throughout the world where people are exposed to natural radiation sources that are in excess of those considered "normal background”. However, there are no specific criteria in this regards, these areas are referred to as "High Natural Radiation (HNRA)" areas. Ramsar is one of these areas. The natural radioactivity of Ramsar is mainly due to the presence of Ra-226 along with its daughters. The aim of this study was to determine the internal and external exposures from natural radiation sources in Ramsar, and to estimate the total annual effective dose for the people in Ramsar. Materials and Methods: In this research, the all radiation sources and exposure pathways of people living in Ramsar were investigated. The concentration of 226Ra was measured by alpha spectrometry and radon emanation in different samples including foods and drinking water, and the internal dose was estimated. In addition, the annual effective dose of exposure to gamma rays and the annual effective dose due to inhalation of radon gas were calculated for residents. Results: The mean annual effective dose due to exposure to indoor gamma rays in Ramsar was 0.66 mSv, the range was 0.3 to 48 mSv, the mean annual effective dose due to exposure to outdoor gamma rays was 0.86 mSv, and the minimum was 0.1 mSv. The mean annual effective dose of internal exposure to radon gas was 10.3 mSv and its range was from 0.9 to 232 mSv. The mean annual effective dose due to ingestion of 226Ra was found 10 µSv and its range was 1 to 81 μSv. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the public annual effective dose of Ramsar from exposure to natural radiation sources was 1.25 to 281 mSv, with a mean value of 12 mSv. The results of this study show that the mean value (12 mSv) is approximately 5 times greater than the worldwide mean annual exposure to natural radiation sources reported by the UNSCAER (2.4 mSv). The results obtained could be used in determining the reference levels for controlling the exposure of people and in taking preventive measures to reduce the radiation exposure of the residents. In addition, the results of this research could be useful in the study of the effect of radiation on the public health.
similar resources
Evaluation of public exposure in high background natural radiation areas (HBNRAs) of Ramsar
Some areas in Ramsar, a northern city of IRAN, have the most natural radiation level in the world which is due to high concentration of 226Ra and its daughter products specially 222Rn and therefore these regions have been interested for radiation related investigations. The aim of this study also has been to evaluate public exposure in such areas in Ramsar, in order to obtain up to date informa...
full textDoes short-term exposure to elevated levels of natural gamma radiation in Ramsar cause oxidative stress?
BACKGROUND Ramsar, a city in northern Iran, has areas with some of the highest recorded levels of natural radiation among inhabited areas measured on the earth. AIMS To determine whether short-term exposure to extremely high levels of natural radiation induce oxidative stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, 53 Wistar rats were randomly divided into five groups of 10-12 animals. Animal...
full textRadon exposure vs. exposure to other sources of ionising radiation.
The purpose of this contribution is to situate the radon issue within the whole field of radiation protection. There is among health physicists a fairly general consensus that exposure to radon decay products constitutes the largest and most variable contribution to the population exposure. It is therefore ironical that precisely this exposure is the subject of constant disputes with regard to ...
full textNatural Sources of Ionizing Radiation
Many of our students seem to have well-defined but not necessarily well-founded opinions on the biological effects of ionizing radiation. During discussions of nuclear transformations in introductory chemistry and physics courses we might be able to help these students better understand the magnitude of these effects, and perhaps sort out the plethora of units with which radiation measurements ...
full textPhysical characteristics and sources of exposure to artificial UV radiation
UV radiation belongs to the non-ionizing part of the electromagnetic spectrum and ranges between 100 nm and 400 nm; 100 nm has been chosen arbitrarily as the boundary between nonionizing and ionizing radiation. UV radiation is conventionally categorized into 3 regions: UVA (>315–400 nm), UVB (>280–315 nm) and UVC (>100–280 nm) (Figure 1). These categories have been confirmed by the Commission I...
full textTOPICAL REPORT High levels of natural radiation Report of an international conference in Ramsar
36 I ublic awareness about exposure to natural sources of radiation has been growing in recent years at a rather accelerated pace. Exposure to high levels of radon indoors, for example, has drawn considerable attention, and a number of countries have already adopted regulatory measures to mitigate exposure to radon in existing houses and to establish radon limits for new buildings. Another area...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 15 issue Special Issue-12th. Iranian Congress of Medical Physics
pages 2- 2
publication date 2018-12-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023