Place Goes Wrong in Treating Mind-brain Relationship Clarifying why identity theory is neither reasonable nor a mere scientific problem in disguise

author

Abstract:

پِلِیس بر این باور است که مسائل فلسفی مرتبط با ماهیتِ نسبتِ میان ذهن و مغز، در نهایت به­نفعِ مادی­گرایی -خصوصاً نظریه این­همانیِ نوعی- کنار گذاشته یا منحل خواهند شد. او این مدعا را فرضیه­ای علمی و مستدل می­داند. من در این مقاله نشان خواهم داد که ماجرا به­گونه­ای نیست که او می­پندارد. اگر چه این متن، سراسر، حاوی جزئیات فراوانی در باب موضع پِلِیس است ولی به­ منظور فراهم آوردن بستری برای نقد، در ابتدا، رویکرد او به مسئله مد نظر را اجمالاً توضیح خواهم داد. سپس، موضع او را به چهار تز فروکاسته و نشان خواهم داد که مدعای اصلی نظریه این­همانیِ نوعی، علاوه بر آن که مستدل نیست بلکه حتی مسئله­ای صرفاً متعلق به علوم تجربی نیز به ­شمار نمی­آید. من بر این باورم که نظریه این­همانیِ نوعی، حداکثر، باید به­ منزله فرضیه­ای تلقی شود که اگر چه به ­طور تقریبی ناظر به کارکردِ نسبتِ میان ذهن و مغز است ولی هیچ چیزی را درباره ماهیتِ واقعیِ این نسبت نمایان نمی­سازد.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

place goes wrong in treating mind-brain relationship clarifying why identity theory is neither reasonable nor a mere scientific problem in disguise

u. t. place claims that philosophical problems concerning the true nature of mind-brain relationship disappears or is settled adhering to materialism, especially type identity theory of mind. he takes above claim as a reasonable scientific hypothesis. i shall argue why it is not as he claims. at first, to pave the way for refutation, i will briefly clarify place's approach to the subject i...

full text

What Price Privacy? - and why identity theft is about neither identity nor theft

It is commonplace to note that in surveys people claim to place a high value on privacy while they paradoxically throw away their privacy in exchange for a free hamburger or a two dollar discount on groceries. The usual conclusion is that people do not really value their privacy as they claim to or that they are irrational about the risks they are taking. Similarly it is generally claimed that ...

full text

A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable.

Primary care panel sizes are an important component of primary care practices. Determining the appropriate panel size has implications for patient access, physician workload, and care comprehensiveness and will have an impact on quality of care. An often quoted standard panel size is 2500. However, this number seems to arise in the literature anecdotally, without a basis in research. Subsequent...

full text

A Unified Theory of Mind-Brain Relationship: Is It Possible?

The mind-body relationship has vexed philosophers of mind for quite a long time. Different theories of mind have offered different points of view about the interaction between the two, but none of them seem free of ambiguities and questions. This paper attempts to use a mathematical model for mind-body relationship. The model may generate some questions to think about this relationship from the...

full text

Why Quantum Theory is Possibly Wrong

Quantum theory is a tremendously successful physical theory, but nevertheless suffers from two serious problems: the measurement problem and the problem of interpretational underdetermination. The latter, however, is largely overlooked as a genuine problem of its own. Both problems concern the doctrine of realism, but pull, quite curiously, into opposite directions. The measurement problem can ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 9  issue 17

pages  173- 202

publication date 2016-02-20

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023