Management of tibial non-:union: using reamed interlocking intra-medullary nailing
Authors
Abstract:
Abstract Background: Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of the tibia is a procedure for the treatment of a non-infected tibial non:::union:::. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the outcome of this method as a treatment of tibial non:::union:::. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with non:::union::: after initial therapy for tibial fracture were retrospectively assessed after a reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing. The main measurements were derived from radiographic and clinical :::union::: as well as time from reamed nailing to :::union:::. Results: Twenty-eight patients achieved :::union::: of their fracture (97%). The average time from reamed nailing to :::union::: was 7.6 months. Serious complications included one severe infection in the site of surgery (3%) and one tibial fracture distal to the nail (3%). Conclusion: Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for non:::union:::s of the tibia resulted in a high :::union::: rate and was associated with a low complication rate. This technique is recommended as a standard procedure for non-infected tibial non:::union:::s.
similar resources
management of tibial non-::union:: using reamed interlocking intra-medullary nailing
abstract background: reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of the tibia is a procedure for the treatment of a non-infected tibial non::::union::::. the purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the outcome of this method as a treatment of tibial non::::union::::. methods: twenty-nine patients with non::::union:::: after initial therapy for tibial fracture were retrospectively ass...
full textmanagement of tibial non-:::union::: using reamed interlocking intra-medullary nailing
abstract background: reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of the tibia is a procedure for the treatment of a non-infected tibial non:::::union:::::. the purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the outcome of this method as a treatment of tibial non:::::union:::::. methods: twenty-nine patients with non:::::union::::: after initial therapy for tibial fracture were retrospective...
full textUse of reamed locked intramedullary nailing in the treatment of aseptic diaphyseal tibial non-union.
BACKGROUND Tibial fractures have been associated with the highest rates of bone union disturbances for many years. Stabilization of the tibial shaft with a reamed intramedullary nail is now being increasingly recommended as a treatment of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of treatment of tibial shaft non-union with reamed intramedullary nails locked distally and proxima...
full textSystem evaluation on reamed and non-reamed intramedullary nailing in the treatment of closed tibial fracture.
PURPOSE To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing in treatment of closed tibial fractures with Cochrane systematic review methods. METHODS According to the Cochrane systematic review methods, literatures were retrieved from Cochrane library, PubMed, EMbase and other database. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized control...
full textIlizarov treatment for aseptic delayed union or non-union after reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur.
The authors reviewed eight patients treated with an Ilizarov frame for a non-infected delayed union or non-union after reamed intramedullary nailing of the femoral diaphysis. The hardware was completely removed in all cases but two, in which the distal fragment of a broken nail was left in situ. In five cases without shortening, progressive compression was applied. In the other three patients a...
full textReamed nailing of Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures.
Reamed intramedullary nailing was carried out on R57 Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures in 55 patients. After debridement, there was substantial bone loss in 28 fractures (49%). The mean time to union was 43 weeks (14 to 94). When there was no bone loss, the mean time to union was 32 weeks; it was 45 weeks if there was bone loss. Fractures complicated by infection took a mean of 53 weeks to he...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 22 issue 4
pages 183- 190
publication date 2009-02
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023