Kant and Hegel on Aesthetic Reflexivity
author
Abstract:
The paper aims at reevaluating a conception of the aesthetic that was developed by Kant and Hegel but that has been widely neglected due to the fact that their positions in aesthetics have been wrongly considered to be antagonistic to one another. The conception states that the aesthetic is a practice of reflecting on other human practices. Kant was the first to articulate this conception, but nevertheless falls short of giving a satisfying account of it, as he doesn’t succeed in explaining its objective aspect. I claim that Hegel resolves this problem by understanding works of art as objects that thermalize essential orientations of historical-cultural practices. But his explanation fails to grasp the specificity of art as a reflective practice. However, Hegel’s position gives us a hint for how to deal with this problem: Reflection has to be understood in a practical, and not in a cognitive sense.
similar resources
Goffman, Action, and Risk Society: Aesthetic Reflexivity in Late Modernity
When I decided to write about edgework over twenty-five years ago, I had no idea that I had put myself on a pathway of sustained engagement with one of the most important sociologists of the twentieth century. As an academic sociologist in the early stages of my career, I felt that I had a good general understanding of Erving Goffman’s most important ideas and a proper appreciation of his uniqu...
full textReal Repugnance and our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel
Kant zufolge muss ein Subjekt, um Wissen von einem Objekt zu erlangen, in der Lage sein zu „beweisen“, dass das Objekt real möglich sei, d.h. zu beweisen, dass es zwischen seinen Eigenschaften weder eine logische Inkonsistenz noch einen „realen Widerspruch“ gebe. Dies ist zwar (gewöhnlich) einfach im Hinblick auf empirische Objekte, aber im Hinblick auf einzelne Dinge an sich selbst (gewöhnlich...
full textHegel On Secularity And Consummated Religion
The relation of religion to secular order has once more assumed centre stage in the renewed conflict between secular democracies and a traditional religiosity turned fiercely political. The extreme development of the former had seen politics represented as the only true redemption and religion condemned as the malaise of self-alienated humanity, to be purged altogether or rendered subordinate t...
full textSpinoza and Kant on Suicide
In this paper I’m going to argue that both, Spinoza and Kant, construct the argument “for the impossibility of self-destruction” and examine how the concept of suicide relates to the concept of humanity in both philosophers. I will argue that Kant’s and Spinoza’s argument for the impossibility of self-destruction follows from the “external cause” premise and not from “the same subject” premise....
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 12 issue 24
pages 95- 113
publication date 2018-09-23
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023