Has Richard Rorty a moral philosophy?
author
Abstract:
در این مقاله سعی دارم نشان دهم که رورتی هرچند همانند کانت فیلسوف اخلاق محسوب نمیشود، ولی با این حال فلسفۀ اخلاقی دارد که باید آن را جدی گرفت. رورتی به نحو نظاممند با مسائل اخلاقی درگیر نمیشود آنطور که فیلسوفان مدرن و معاصر درگیرند. این مقاله دو بخش دارد: بخش نخست با مبانی فلسفۀ رورتی مثل ضد ماهیت باوری، داروینگرایی، فرویدگرایی و تاریخگرایی سروکار دارد. بخش دوم که تا حدودی مفصل است، بسیاری از مضامین اخلاقی مثل نقد اخلاق کانتی، همبستگی، پیشرفت اخلاقی، ظلم و ستم و غیره را در اندیشه رورتی مورد ارزیابی قرار میدهد. در نهایت میخواهد به این سوال جواب دهد که آیا رورتی فلسفۀ اخلاق دارد یا نه؟
similar resources
has richard rorty a moral philosophy?
i try to show that richard rorty, although is not a moral philosopher like kant, nerveless, has moral philosophy that must be taken seriously. rorty was not engaged with moral philosophy in the systematic manner common among leading modern and contemporary moral philosophers. this paper has two parts: first part, in brief, is concerned with principles of his philosophy such as anti-essentialism...
full textNOTICE : Richard Rorty : Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature :
Richard Rorty: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature: Thirtieth-Anniversary Edition is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, © 2009, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing fr...
full textAgents, Spectators, and Social Hope. Richard Rorty and American Intellectuals
Rorty wrote his Achieving Our Country as a philosopher, intellectual, academic and citizen, and each of these perspectives leads to a different emphasis in reading his book, and to a different story (and ‘storytelling’ is one of the themes of the book). The emergent pictures vary: the philosopher tells a story of the growing isolation and cultural sterility of analytic philosophy in the United ...
full textBerkeley's moral philosophy.
Berkeley held that the moral duty of mankind was to obey God's laws; that--since God was a benevolent Creator--the object of His laws must be to promote the welfare and flourishing of mankind; and that, accordingly, humans could identify their moral duties by asking what system of laws for conduct would in fact tend to promote that object. This position--which is akin to that of 'rule' Utilitar...
full textMoral ape philosophy
Our closest relative the chimpanzee seems to display proto-moral behavior. Some scholars emphasize the similarities between humans and chimpanzees, others some key differences. This paper aims is to formulate a set of intermediate conditions between a sometimes helpful chimpanzee and moral man. I specify these intermediate conditions as requirements for the chimpanzees, and for each requirement...
full textMoral Philosophy in Question:
3.1. The Underlying Problem of Moral Philosophy: Decoupling from the Life-Ground 3.2. The Conventional Tendency: Prescribing and Punishing Without Good Reason 3.3. The Professional Tendency: Moral Philosophy without Life Substance 3.4. Evaluating Social Value Systems: Off-Limits Even to Marxian Thought 3.5. What the Organism Wants: Desire Theory and its Fatal Flaw 3.6. The Paradox of Market Suc...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 9 issue 17
pages 53- 74
publication date 2016-02-20
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023