Existence Results of best Proximity Pairs for a Certain Class of Noncyclic Mappings in Nonreflexive Banach Spaces Polynomials
author
Abstract:
Introduction Let be a nonempty subset of a normed linear space . A self-mapping is said to be nonexpansive provided that for all . In 1965, Browder showed that every nonexpansive self-mapping defined on a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space , has a fixed point. In the same year, Kirk generalized this existence result by using a geometric notion of normal structure. We recall that a nonempty and convex subset of a Banach space is said to have normal structure if for any nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of with , there exists a point for which . The well-known Kirk’s fixed point theorem states that if is a nonempty, weakly compact and convex subset of a Banach space which has the normal structure and is a nonexpansive mapping, then has at least one fixed point. In view of the fact that every nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space has the normal structure, the Browder’ fixed point result is an especial case of Kirk’s theorem. Material and methods Let be a nonempty pair of subsets of a normed linear space . is said to be a noncyclic mapping if . Also the noncyclic mapping is called relatively nonexpansive whenever for any . Clearly, if , then we get the class of nonexpppansive self-mappings. Moreover, we note the noncyclic relatively nonexpansive mapping may not be continuous, necessarily. For the noncyclic mapping , a point is called a best proximity pair provided that In the other words, the point is a best proximity pair for if and are two fixed points of which estimates the distance between the sets and . The first existence result about such points which is an interesting extension of Browder’s fixed point theorem states that if is a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex pair in a uniformly convex Banach space and if is a noncyclic relatively nonexpansive mapping, then has a best proximity pair. Furthermore, a real generalization of Kirk’s fixed point result for noncyclic relatively nonexpansive mappings was proved by using a geometric concept of proximal normal structure, defined on a nonempty and convex pair in a considered Banach space. Results and discussion Let be a nonempty and convex pair of subsets of a normed linear space and be a noncyclic mapping. The main purpose of this article is to study of the existence of best proximity pairs for another class of noncyclic mappings, called noncyclic strongly relatively C-nonexpansive. To this end, we use a new geometric notion entitled -uniformly semi-normal structure defined on in a Banach space which is not reflexive, necessarily. To illustrate this geometric property, we show that every nonempty, bounded, closed and convex pair in uniformly convex Banach spaces has -uniformly semi-normal structure under some sufficient conditions. Conclusion The following conclusions were drawn from this research. We introduce a geometric notion of -uniformly semi-normal structure and prove that: Let be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex pair in a strictly convex Banach space such that is nonempty and . Let be a noncyclic strongly relatively C-nonexpansive mapping. If has the -uniformly semi-normal structure, then has a best proximity pair. In the setting of uniformly convex in every direction Banach space , we also prove that: Let be a nonempty, weakly compact and convex pair in and be a noncyclic mapping such that for all with . If where is a projection mapping defined on then has -semi-normal structure. We present some examples showing the useability of our main conclusions. ./files/site1/files/42/8Abstract.pdf
similar resources
Best Proximity Pair Theorems for Noncyclic Mappings in Banach and Metric Spaces
Let A and B be two nonempty subsets of a metric space X. A mapping T : A∪B → A∪B is said to be noncyclic if T (A) ⊆ A and T (B) ⊆ B. For such a mapping, a pair (x, y) ∈ A×B such that Tx = x, Ty = y and d(x, y) = dist(A,B) is called a best proximity pair. In this paper we give some best proximity pair results for noncyclic mappings under certain contractive conditions.
full textCoincidence Quasi-Best Proximity Points for Quasi-Cyclic-Noncyclic Mappings in Convex Metric Spaces
We introduce the notion of quasi-cyclic-noncyclic pair and its relevant new notion of coincidence quasi-best proximity points in a convex metric space. In this way we generalize the notion of coincidence-best proximity point already introduced by M. Gabeleh et al cite{Gabeleh}. It turns out that under some circumstances this new class of mappings contains the class of cyclic-noncyclic mappings ...
full textSome results on convergence and existence of best proximity points
In this paper, we introduce generalized cyclic φ-contraction maps in metric spaces and give some results of best proximity points of such mappings in the setting of a uniformly convex Banach space. Moreover, we obtain convergence and existence results of proximity points of the mappings on reflexive Banach spaces
full textNonreflexive Banach Ssd Spaces
In this paper, we unify the theory of SSD spaces, part of the theory of strongly representable multifunctions, and the theory of the equivalence of various classes of maximally monotone multifunctions. 0 Introduction In this paper, we unify three different lines of investigation: the theory of SSD spaces as expounded in [11] and [13], part of the theory of strongly representable multifunctions ...
full textOn Best Proximity Points in metric and Banach spaces
Notice that best proximity point results have been studied to find necessaryconditions such that the minimization problemminx∈A∪Bd(x,Tx)has at least one solution, where T is a cyclic mapping defined on A∪B.A point p ∈ A∪B is a best proximity point for T if and only if thatis a solution of the minimization problem (2.1). Let (A,B) be a nonemptypair in a normed...
full textBest Proximity Pairs in Uniformly Convex Spaces
In this paper we prove existence theorems of best proximity pairs in uniformly convex spaces, using a fixed point theorem for Kakutani factorizable multi-functions.
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 4 issue 2
pages 229- 240
publication date 2019-02
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
No Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023