Diagnostic Sensitivity of F-wave Parameters in Unilateral S1 Radiculopathy
Authors
Abstract:
Background: F-wave study, part of electrodiagnostic study, has had a controversial sensitivity in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Objectives: We aimed to compare F wave parameters obtained from the tibial nerve of both extremities in patients with unilateral S1 radiculopathy. Materials and Methods: The study was done from March to September 2015 in the Electrodiagnostic laboratory of an academic hospital affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 19 consecutive patients with clinically and electromyographically approved diagnosis of unilateral S1 radiculopathy entered the study. F-wave parameters (F minimum latency, F maximum latency, F chronodispersion and F persistence) were recorded from tibial nerve of both extremities. Patients with diabetes, bilateral S1 radiculopathy or any other disease known to affect peripheral nerves were excluded from the study. Results: Of nineteen participants, 11 were men. Their mean±SD of age was 46.6±13.7 years. There were no significant differences between mean of F wave parameters recorded from affected and unaffected sides. Also, it was shown that, there was a positive correlation between these parameters in two extremities. Conclusion: The current study compared various F-wave parameters and the results did not support employing F-wave study as a sensitive method for detecting unilateral S1 radiculopathy.
similar resources
diagnostic sensitivity of f-wave parameters in unilateral s1 radiculopathy
background: f-wave study, part of electrodiagnostic study, has had a controversial sensitivity in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. objectives: we aimed to compare f wave parameters obtained from the tibial nerve of both extremities in patients with unilateral s1 radiculopathy. materials and methods: the study was done from march to september 2015 in the electrodiagnostic laboratory o...
full textClinical utility of F wave parameters in unilateral S1 radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the F wave parameters (F duration, F minimum latency, F maximum latency, F mean latency, F chronodispersion, and F persistence) of the tibial nerve with unilateral S1 radiculopathy. We evaluated the differences of these parameters between the affected and unaffected sides and also with the control group. METHODS The study was performed from September 2007 to January 2...
full textThe diagnostic sensitivity of different F wave parameters.
OBJECTIVE To examine the relative diagnostic sensitivity of various F wave parameters. METHODS Normal values for minimum, mean, and maximum F wave latency, chronodispersion, and persistence in the four major motor nerves were established and systematically applied to at least four separate categories of patients (radiculopathies, polyneuropathies, mononeuropathies, and others). F Waves were s...
full textThe diagnostic sensitivity of diVerent F wave parameters
Objective—To examine the relative diagnostic sensitivity of various F wave parameters. Methods—Normal values for minimum, mean, and maximum F wave latency, chronodispersion, and persistence in the four major motor nerves were established and systematically applied to at least four separate categories of patients (radiculopathies, polyneuropathies, mononeuropathies, and others). F Waves were stu...
full textthe relationship between s1 radiculopathy
background: s1 radiculopathy is a high prevalence illness and its early diagnosis is of crucial importance. several reports have revealed the efficacy of magnetic stimulation in diagnosis of this condition. we conducted this study to compare mmep latency and mmep amplitude in patients with s1 radiculopathy and healthy controls in shohadaye tajreash hospital in 2007. materials and methods: this ...
full textRestless legs syndrome mimicking S1 radiculopathy.
Α case of a chronic idiopathic form of a severe type of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), which developed during pregnancy and persisted after this, misdiagnosed for 34 years as radiculopathy S1, is reported. In spite of the thorough clinical and laboratory investigation, in addition to constant changes of the therapeutic approach, the diagnosis of S1 radiculopathy could not be confirmed, resulting...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 2 issue 6
pages 20- 24
publication date 2016-09
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023