Correlation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Authors
Abstract:
Background: The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, one-question patient-reported outcomemeasure (PROM). We systematically reviewed correlations between SANE and more extensive PROMs.Methods: We identified studies with correlation coefficients between SANE and other shoulder, knee, and anklespecificPROMs. We calculated mean, median and range across studies and time points of data collection.Results: Eleven studies provided 14 correlations, six shoulder-specific PROMs in four studies, six knee-specific PROMsin six studies and two ankle specific PROMs in one study. The mean correlation comparing SANE and knee-specificPROMs was 0.60 (SD 0.24), median 0.66, and range 0.12 to 0.88. Among studies comparing SANE and shoulderspecificPROMs mean correlation was 0.59 (SD 0.20), median 0.62 and range 0.20 to 0.89. The mean correlationbetween SANE and ankle-specific PROMs was 0.69 (SD 0.17), median 0.69 and range 0.75 to 0.81.Conclusion: There seems to be moderate correlation amongst PROMs, even those that are a single question. Futureresearch might address whether patient reported outcome measure a common underlying construct even when theyconsist of a single question.Level of evidence: V
similar resources
Understanding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been identified as being measures of a patient's health status or health-related quality of life, allowing for health status information to be collected from patients before and after an intervention through completion of a questionnaire. The information collected will provide an indication of the outcomes or quality of care delivered to NHS Patien...
full textPatient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients' involvement in clinical research and service evaluat...
full textAddressing Missing Data in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now routinely collected in the English National Health Service and used to compare and reward hospital performance within a high-powered pay-for-performance scheme. However, PROMs are prone to missing data. For example, hospitals often fail to administer the pre-operative questionnaire at hospital admission, or patients may refuse to participate or ...
full textMeasurement of generic patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an acute admission unit: A feasibility study.
OBJECTIVE Measuring patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a challenge in Acute Admission Units (AAUs), where patients present with a variety of pathologies. Generic PROMs may be used to measure the quality of care in this population. The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of measuring generic PROMs in a Dutch AAU. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study Setting: An AAU...
full textPatient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instruments
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been introduced in studies to assess healthcare performance. The development of PROMs for primary care poses specific challenges, including a preference for generic measures that can be used across diseases, including early phases or mild conditions. This pilot study aimed to explore the potential usefulness of seven generic measures for...
full textEnhancing rigour in the validation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): bridging linguistic and psychometric testing
BACKGROUND A strong consensus exists for a systematic approach to linguistic validation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and discrete methods for assessing their psychometric properties. Despite the need for robust evidence of the appropriateness of measures, transition from linguistic to psychometric validation is poorly documented or evidenced. This paper demonstrates the importan...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 7 issue 4
pages 303- 306
publication date 2019-07-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023