Comparison the Outcomes of Open Thoracotomy and Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer

Authors

  • Mahdi Silanian Toosi Radiotherapist, Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Mitra Ahadi Gastroenterologist, Department of Internal Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Nazanin Hazrati Medical Student, Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Reza Bagheri Thoracic Surgeon, Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Seyed Ziaollah Haghi Thoracic Surgeon, Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:

Introduction: Surgery is the first therapeutic option for esophageal cancer. There is controversy over the selection of the best surgical approach. Regarding this, the present study aimed to compare the minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in terms of their short-term outcomes and preoperative complications. Materials & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 61 patients in Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran, within 2011-2013. The patients were assigned into two groups based on the type of therapeutic approach they received. The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) groups consisted of 31 and 30 patients, respectively. For the purpose of the study, we collected such data as age, gender, site of lesion, bleeding, duration of surgery, rate of switch to open approach, post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and mortality rate. Results: According to the results of the study, 60.7% of the participants were male. The mean age of the patients was 62.39±11.91 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the site of lesion (P=0.014) and stage of tumor (P=0.108). No significant difference was observed between the MIE and OE groups in terms of the blood transfusion (P=0.981). Considering the complications, there was one case of fistula in the MIE group; furthermore, one and two cases of wound infection and pleural effusions were observed in the OE group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the post-operative complications, namely fistula, pleural effusions, and wound infection (P=0.492, P=0.238, and P=0.492, respectively). The MIE group had longer operation time (P≤0.001). There was one patient in the MIE group converted to open approach. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the OE group, and there was no mortality. Conclusion: As the findings of the present study demonstrated, the MIE outcomes were comparable with those of the OE with improved short-term outcomes.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND To compare surgical outcomes of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with open esophagectomy in order to study the learning curve of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancers. METHODS Among 109 esophageal cancer patients retrospectively studied, 59 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and 50 underwent open surgery (OE). In the MIE group, the fir...

full text

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE) has been shown to have clinical advantages, but selection bias is present. METHODS All patients undergoing MIE or OE for cancer between 1999 and 2007 were eligible for analysis. To minimize selection bias, only patients who also met the selection criteria for the thoracoscopic approach were included in the...

full text

Comparison of long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective: To compare surgical outcomes and oncologic efficacy between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) for operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: 81 consecutive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent MIE and another 81 patients who underwent open resection between January 2007 and December 2013 were enrolled in this study. Res...

full text

Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in comparison with the open esophagectomy (OE) remain uncertain in esophageal cancer treatment. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes of the two surgical modalities. METHODS Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov with the following index words: "e...

full text

Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy :

Background—Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to lower morbidity, we have adopted a minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. Objectives—Our primary objective was to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a large group of patients. Our secondary objective was to compare the modified McKeo...

full text

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer – results of surgical therapy

INTRODUCTION The indication for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in esophageal cancer has an increasing tendency. AIM To present our cohort of patients operated on between 2006 and 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single centre study of 106 consecutive esophagectomies performed for esophageal cancer by a minimally invasive approach in 79 patients was performed. Transhiatal laparoscopic es...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 5  issue 2

pages  569- 574

publication date 2017-06-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023