Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Three Different Composite Resins Following Polishing with a Two-Step Technique

Authors

  • Eslami, Arezoo Faculty of dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) branch, Islamic Azad university
  • Roghani, Sara Faculty of dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) branch, Islamic Azad university
Abstract:

Background and Aim: Nowadays, demand for same–color restorative materials, especially resin composites, is increasing. Access to the smooth surface with minimum level of surface roughness significantly results in more beauty, and the reduction of the accumulation of the plaque, gingival inflammation, and tooth discoloration. the aim of this study was surface roughness of three different composite’s resins following the polish with a two-step technique has been evaluated. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, three types of composite; Charisma Classic, Charisma Topaz and Charisma Diamond have been investigated. Every type of the composite includes 40 disc-shape specimens with 5 and 3mm in height were provided. Specimens of each composite type were divided into two categories, tested group and negative control group. The tested groups were polished by twisted and the control groups were not subjected to any kind of polishing process. Then, the overall level of surface roughness in each group was measured. The data were analyzed with independent t test, ANOVA and the Tokay Test. Results: The mean surface roughness of all three types of composites after polishing by the twisted was significantly lower than the control group (p <0.001). The mean level of surface roughness in Charisma Classic and Charisma Topaz composites was not significantly different.(P=0.2) the mean surface roughness in Charisma Diamond composite was significantly higher than Charisma Classic and Charisma Topaz composites (p <0.001). The mean of surface roughness was not significantly different between the three control groups (p = 0.24). Conclusion: Microhybrid composite showed the lowest level of surface roughness after the standard polishing process. Keywords: composite resins, Dental Polishing, surface roughness  

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing.

This study evaluated the effect of surface finishing methods on the average surface roughness of resin composites. Seven composites and two polishing systems were used. One hundred and twenty-six conical specimens of each material were prepared in stainless steel molds against a polyester strip. Forty-two of them remained intact and were used as controls. Each half of the remaining samples was ...

full text

Evaluation of the surface roughness of three heat-cured acrylic denture base resins with different conventional lathe polishing techniques: A comparative study

PURPOSE Surface roughness promotes adhesion and colonization of denture plaque. Therefore, it is important to know the effects of polishing and finishing on the surface roughness of various acrylic resin materials. OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the effects of different conventional lathe polishing techniques on heat cured acrylic resins in producing surface roughness. MATERIALS AND MET...

full text

Evaluation of the Surface Hardness of Composite Resins before and after Polishing at Different Times

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hardness of six composite resins: Revolution, Natural Flow, Fill Magic Flow, Flow-it! (flowables), Silux Plus (microfilled) and Z100 (minifilled) before and after polishing at different times. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this purpose, 240 specimens (5mm diameter, 1.4mm high) were prepared. Vickers hardness was determined before and after...

full text

Effects of Wet and Dry Finishing and Polishing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Composite Resins

Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of wet and dry finishing and polishing on microhardness and roughness of microhybrid and nanohybrid composites. Materials and Methods Thirty samples were fabricated of each of the Polofil Supra and Aelite Aesthetic All-Purpose Body microhybrid and Grandio and Aelite Aesthetic Enamel nanohybrid composite resins. Each group (n=30) was divided int...

full text

Effect of the Polishing Procedures on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Composite Resins

Objectives. To evaluate the polishing procedures effect on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. Methods. Specimens were distributed into 6 groups: G1: Filtek Supreme XT + PoGo; G2: Filtek Supreme XT + Sof-Lex; G3: Filtek Supreme XT + no polishing; G4: Amelogen + PoGo; G5: Amelogen + Sof-Lex.; G6: Amelogen + no polishing. Initial color values were evaluated using the CIELab...

full text

Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Satisfactory composite restoration depends upon its smooth finish, quality of polishing agents, type of composite material used, and its composition. The present study evaluated the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty discs of composite were prepared and equally subjected to different finishing and ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 19  issue 4

pages  295- 302

publication date 2022-12

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

No Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023