Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review

Authors

  • Ali Moradi Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Hasan Mehrad Majd Clinical Research Unit, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • Pouria Pasdar Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) also known as tennis elbow is a common disease of middle-aged population.Surgery is a treatment of choice in patients not responded to the conservative management. Open and arthroscopicrelease are the two main choices for LE surgery; however, an overall consensus is not available. This study was aimedto compare the clinical outcomes after conventional open and arthroscopic procedures.Methods: An electronic search of databases including, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, andScopus was conducted to identify all eligible studies describing the post-operative clinical outcomes of patients withLE, up to October 2018. All studies considering the non-pediatric cases who received at least 6-month preoperativeconservative treatment and were followed more than 6 months after surgery were included. Data on patient satisfaction,functional outcomes, pain, and complication rates, were extracted for each study. If appropriate, the meta-analysiswas performed to combine the results for all outcomes that were reported in a minimum of 3 studies utilizing the samesurgical technique.Results: A total of 34 eligible articles including 15 open studies, 13 arthroscopic studies, and 6 studies in bothtechniques were enrolled. Studies were from different parts of the world with a whole sample size of 1508 cases.Various outcome measuring methods including Quick DASH and VAS, and different clinical outcomes were reported.The results indicated no significant difference between arthroscopic and open surgery methods in terms of VAS,DASH score, time for returning to work, overall outcomes, and patients’ satisfaction (P >0.05). However, postoperativecomplications were significantly higher in the open group when compared with the arthroscopic procedure (57.3%vs 33.4% P=0.001).Conclusion: The present study suggests that despite no superiority for each techniques regarding the pain relief,subjective function, and better rehabilitation, arthroscopic method have been associated with less complications.Level of evidence: II

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Clinical efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: We aimed to compare the efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis in a Bayesian framework. Methods: We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest, for randomized controlled trials published from inception to February 2021 in any languages. The injection therapies included corticosteroids (C...

full text

Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a systematic review.

Prior to 1972, a variety of operations were performed to treat rotator cuff pain. Neer in 1972 recommended an anterior acromioplasty, which quickly became the standard of care based on Level IV and Level V evidence. In 1987, Ellman offered an arthroscopic approach to performing the acromioplasty; since then Level I studies have been conducted to assess the success of the arthroscopic approach. ...

full text

Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review

Objective. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for lateral epicondylitis (LE). Methods. Seven databases and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal were searched to identify relevant studies. The data were extracted and assessed by two independent authors, and Review Manager Software (V.5.3) was used for data synthesis...

full text

Arthroscopic Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is a common orthopedic condition affecting up to 3% of the American population. Rest, activity modification, and conservative therapies are generally efficacious in relieving symptoms in the majority of patients; however, a small percentage of people will experience refractory pain and require surgical intervention to alleviate their discomfort. Surgical release of the ext...

full text

Arthroscopic Management of Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) occurs in 1% to 3% of the general population, and most commonly affects the dominant extremity [3] of adults aged 35 to 50 years old [4]. LE reportedly occurs equally in males and females, [3,5] although one study found males are four to five times more likely to develop LE compared to females [6]. The condition is usually self-limited, [7,8] although some articles re...

full text

Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

Lateral epicondylitis refractory to conservative care can be effectively treated by arthroscopic release of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin. Advantages to the technique include the ability to address other intra-articular sources of pain (capsular tears, radiocapitellar plica, etc.), a potentially faster return to work and sports, and a smaller incision. This article provides step-by-...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 7  issue 2

pages  91- 104

publication date 2019-03-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023