Assessment of the interprofessional collaboration of healthcare team members: validation of Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) and pilot study

author

  • Keshmiri, Fatemeh Educational Development Center, Medical Education Department, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran Faculty of Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:

Background and Aim: Developing Interprofessional education and collaboration is important in systems of medical sciences to deliver better health care. The present study aimed to assess the validation of the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) (validity, reliability and confirmatory factor analysis). Also, the interprofessional collaboration of the healthcare team members in emergency departments was evaluated by ICAR. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the face and content validity of ICAR was assessed. The Rubric includes 17 items in six domains including communication skills, collaboration, role and responsibility, teamwork, collaborative patient-centered approach, and conflict management). Also, a confirmatory factor analysis of Rubric was assessed. The reliability of the Rubric was evaluated by internal consistency and reproducibility (test-retest approach). The CFA assessed using Maximum Likelihood by EQS. In the second phase, the interprofessional collaboration of Emergency care team members (including 70 residents, interns, and nurses) were assessed by direct observations. Also, an inter-professional collaboration of healthcare team members was analyzed using descriptive tests (mean and standard deviation) and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare between groups. Results: The face and content validity of ICAR approved by consensus of 18 faculty members in medical education, nursing education and clinical specialties (CVI>0.70 and CVR>0.49). The reliability of Rubric approved by Cronbach's alpha =0.89 and ICC=0.80. The construct of Rubric confirmed in six domains through GFI=0.9, AGFI=0.9, CFI=0.976, RMSEA=0.06, χ2/df=1.88, χ2=195.78, df=104, P<0.001. The mean score of participants (including interns, emergency medical assistants, and nursing personnel) in the emergency department was 63.35 (17.53). There was a significant difference between the performance of three groups (nurses, interns and assistants) (p-value=0.03). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the scores of inter-professional cooperation of participants in the present study were lower than expected. It is recommended to plan and implement interprofessional training courses to improve inter-professional collaboration between healthcare providers in the study environment. Regarding, the confirmation of ICAR validation, it can be used to assess the interprofessional collaboration of participants.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation

Background: Simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. The aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborative Assessment tool (ICAR) in an Iranian context using simulation. &nbsp; Methods: In this descriptive study, contextualization of the ICAR was assessed throug...

full text

contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (icar) through simulation: pilot investigation

background: simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. the aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the interprofessional collaborative assessment tool (icar) in an iranian context using simulation.   methods: in this descriptive study, contextualization of the icar was assessed through severa...

full text

Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation

BACKGROUND Simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. The aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborative Assessment tool (ICAR) in an Iranian context using simulation. METHODS In this descriptive study, contextualization of the ICAR was assessed through several ...

full text

contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (icar) through simulation: pilot investigation

background: simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. the aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the interprofessional collaborative assessment tool (icar) in an iranian context using simulation.   methods: in this descriptive study, contextualization of the icar was assessed through severa...

full text

Reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) in Multi Source Feedback (MSF) with post-graduate medical residents

BACKGROUND Increased attention on collaboration and teamwork competency development in medical education has raised the need for valid and reliable approaches to the assessment of collaboration competencies in post-graduate medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a modified Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) in a multi-source feedback...

full text

assessment of the efficiency of s.p.g.c refineries using network dea

data envelopment analysis (dea) is a powerful tool for measuring relative efficiency of organizational units referred to as decision making units (dmus). in most cases dmus have network structures with internal linking activities. traditional dea models, however, consider dmus as black boxes with no regard to their linking activities and therefore do not provide decision makers with the reasons...

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 21  issue 6

pages  647- 656

publication date 2019-12

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

No Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023