Assessing Physicians’ Performance when Telling the Truth to Patients Diagnosed with Cancer

Authors

  • Amir Hossein Emami Dept. of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Cancer institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Farhad Shahi Dept. of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Cancer institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mandana Shirazi Dept. of Clinical Sciences and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Minoosh Moghimi Dept. of Hematology & Medical Oncology,School of Medicine, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  • Reza Mansouri Dept. of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Cancer institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Samira Mokhtari Dept. of Neonatology,School of Medicine, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  • Sepehr Gohari School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
  • Zahra Abbaspour Rad Dept. of Internal Medicine, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract:

Background and Objective: The ability of breaking bad news to patients, especially to patients diagnosed with cancer is one of the challengeable issues in the field of medicine. On this basis, this study was designed to assess physicianschr('39') performance as well as importance of their training on how to deliver bad news to patients diagnosed with cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study for assessing physicians’ performance in delivering bad news. The hematologists and oncologists from Imam Khomeini and Shariati hospitals, Tehran, Iran, were included in the study. A questionnaire for physicians (SPIKES model) which comprised six statements was used to evaluate their performance. The time of breaking the cancer diagnosis news to the patients by the physicians and educational records were evaluated with the average score of the physicians in relation to each statement. Results: Totally, 12 physicians participated in the study. There was no significant difference between the statements and age or gender (P>0.05); but there was a significant relationship between ending the discussion (conversation), summarizing the content, and using the word "cancer” during the conversation (P<0.05). Additionally, there was significant correlation between the time spent on informing the patient about the cancer diagnosis and concluding the discussion and summarizing the statements (P<0.05). Conclusion: Guidelines which are introducing the most harmless methods for delivering bad news with minimal negative effects on the patients’ mental health can be helpful for the medical staff, so that they can perform this important task with less stress and minimum complications for the patients.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Telling Patients the Truth

This article discusses the ethical necessity of health care workers telling their patients the truth about both their diagnosis and prognosis. This necessity is based upon respect for persons, utility, and kindness. Within this ethical obligation to tell the truth, however, there are several different ways in which the truth can be told. In particular, this paper stresses that telling patients ...

full text

Telling the truth with compassion.

full text

On telling dying patients the truth.

a busy outpatient clinic (he gives a horrifying example ofincompetent truth telling); it is an honesty which the patient has sought in the course of psychotherapeutically orientated discussion; it is an honesty which includes continuing support; and it is an honesty which, believes Dr Goldie, reduces unnecessary suffering and helps patients to survive it when it is inevitable. Such views, from ...

full text

Telling the truth.

Are doctors and nurses bound by just the same constraints as everyone else in regard to honesty? What, anyway, does honesty require? Telling no lies? Avoiding intentional deception by whatever means? From a utilitarian standpoint lying would seem to be on the same footing as other forms of intentional deception: yielding the same consequences. But utilitarianism fails to explain the wrongness o...

full text

Creating Truth-Telling Incentives with the Bayesian Truth Serum

Vol. L (June 2013), 289–302 289 *Ray Weaver is Assistant Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School, Harvard University (e-mail: [email protected]). Drazen Prelec is Professor of Management, Management Science and Economics, MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (e-mail: [email protected]). This research was supported by NSF SES0519141 and the John...

full text

Attitudes toward Telling the Truth to Cancer Patients in Iran: A Review Article

Background:Patients generally have the right to be informed of their condition, but the debate over the issue of truth disclosure is still present. The attempt of this study is to review the approaches toward truth- telling to cancer patients in Iran. Materials and Methods: This study is a narrative review that included articles published in Iran on attitudes toward telling the truth to cancer ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 29  issue 133

pages  68- 73

publication date 2021-02

{@ msg @}

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023