A brief review of plagiarism in medical scientific research papers [RETRACTED]

Authors

  • Gholam Hassan Danaei Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • Mohammad Karami Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract:

[THIS ARTICLE IS RETRACTED] Plagiarism refers to “adopting someone else’s words, work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own”. It is potentially considered as the most prevalent form of scientific dishonesty discovered in research papers. The present review aims to provide a thorough account of plagiarism to build awareness about all dimensions of plagiarism.The key words “plagiarism”, “types”, “detection” and “consequences” have been applied to retrieve the articles from electronic references such as MEDLINE database. Around five hundred articles have been retrieved. The articles have been subdivided, each group encompassed a dimension of plagiarism. The major findings and updates have been summarized for each topic. The most important reason behind plagiarism as spotted is lack of knowledge about the subject. And when the researchers are trapped with deficient time, in experienced writing skills and the pressure in order get their work published in some decent journals, the authors surreptitiously take access  others’ work and commit plagiarism. Before, detecting plagiarism used to be difficult; however, in recent years,   the journals have devised many plagiarism-detection services and software programs. The current article provides the details on how the journals use these services and software tool to effectively check for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. In academic settings, plagiarism is a potential devastating offense.Plagiarism is taken as the most common problem in research writing. The most critical way to curb it is to build up awareness about how to cope with this ever increasing problem known as research misconduct.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

a brief review of plagiarism in medical scientific research papers

plagiarism refers to “adopting someone else’s words, work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own”. it is potentially considered as the most prevalent form of scientific dishonesty discovered in research papers. the present review aims to provide a thorough account of plagiarism to build awareness about all dimensions of plagiarism.the key words “plagiarism”, “types”, “detection” and “conseq...

full text

Retracted: A brief review of plagiarism in medical scientific research papers. By Mohammad Karami, Gholam Hassan Danaei. [Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research 2016:2(2):1-8]

The Editor and Publisher regretfully have to retract the following publication due to similar to a published article prepared by Rabab A.A. Mohammed et al. entitled Plagiarism in medical scientific research in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (2015) 10(1) 6-11. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by this retraction to readers and authors of last published article.

full text

plagiarism in medical papers

the present article is a brief presentation of various aspects of scientific misconduct in medical papers. the best approach for prevention of scientific misconduct in medical journals is the application of accepted codes of publication ethics.

full text

How many scientific papers should be retracted?

In European research today, mobility has become firmly entrenched as a pre requisite for a successful scientific career; however, the reasons behind this emphasis on scientific nomadism are far from obvious. It is all too common for science policy-makers and funding bodies to extol the seemingly endless virtues of mobility, but it nearly amounts to heresy to ponder the possibility that a move a...

full text

Retracted Papers from the Journal “Medical Archives”

[This retracts the articles DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.132-136, DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.79-81, DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.393-395.].

full text

a genre analytic study of research papers written by bilingual writers and their beliefs: a case of persian-english writers

تحقیق حاضر گزارشی است از تحلیل بخش مقدمه دو دسته از مقالات که عبارتند از: 11 مقاله از دو نویسنده دوزبانه فارسی زبان, که شامل مقدمه 4 مقاله به زبان انگلیسی و چاپ شده در مجلات بین المللی, مقدمه 3 مقاله به زبان انگلیسی و 4 مقاله به زبان فارسی چاپ شده در مجلات داخلی می شود؛ و 12 مقاله از محققان خارجی که در مجله applied linguistics به چاپ رسیده است. مبنای تئوری این تحلیل ها نظریه سوئلز (1990) یا هما...

15 صفحه اول

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 2  issue 2

pages  1- 8

publication date 2016-06

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023