باید و نبایدهای منطق روستابودگی در ایران: کنکاشی بر گفتمان های روستاپژوهی در محافل علمی و دانشگاهی

Abstract: Introduction More titles rural central topic of research in the areas of academic focus on the issue of displacement and movement of population and the need to organize the distribution of population and preserve the current pattern of rural settlements for at least the past 40 years: In other words, how can we prevent rural-urban migration? The same population stabilization and subsequent persistence of rural settlements. Concerns are affected by the intellectual movement in the 40s and 50 against irregularities in the country's modernity arose and new ideas from concept underlines village brought with him: Must be lost before it is returned (not manipulated by external forces and means of agriculture and rural life and decentralization of policy). It was considered an alternative model for rural settlements, in which "local communities replace national economic growth" and the people, culture and rural businesses grow and evolve within the category separate from the process of modernization. Their village was supposed to be defined in and devoid of any policy intervention - the bureaucratic organizations and scientific. The continued hegemony of governance in this sense also penetrated again with a new trick and his label attached on the rurality. In this respect, preserve and maintain the diversity and dispersion of rural settlements (to prevent displacement and migration) was the nearest target the concerns of rural movements and could be replaced by local community and its approach to falsify and somehow with this to be reproduced pretext (save the rural community and its freedom from deprivation) lost power devices bureaucratic and academic circles in rural areas: Where any intervention would distort the original rural  and the decline was founded of its intrinsic values such as nature, culture, customs, traditions and identity is more important than all the rest of Iranian society. The aim of this paper follow-up is important, how rurality concepts common in our rural studies by different approaches to rural areas in production and the scientific and academic circles? What Iranian academic atmosphere faced in relation to discourses rurality gaps in research methodology? Materials and Methods Since rural in the last orientation literature are where clusters of discourse rurality tried to impose their thinking and their actions on another, likened; Our discourse analysis as an appropriate way to illustrate the changes that have occurred in Iran's rural studies, we suggest you. However, an increasing number of studies in recent years have shown that discourse analysis is one of the most effective methods for this effort. Discussion and Results Scholarships country village in the discourse of "justice" (i.e., proportional to urban population in rural communities benefit from development opportunities) central core. The nodes have been established around specific signs that the dominant discourse rural Academic circles to depict us. For example, by looking carefully at the documentation in the fields of specialized books and novels, essays, proposals, newspapers, books and oral interviews took place, Discourse were demonstrated by the village as a "problem", "source" and "regional development" in the history of our rural research. The orientation of the chain of logic "equivalence" provides that the expression of regular Compare / compensation. Due to the impact of the current global rural and promote approaches to building internal capacity was expected to rule through local communities be trained more attention than in the past; But the state and the local community within the meaning of symbolic interventions were rurality. Indeed, through the intervention of hegemonic and central established slab / compensation of rurality different meaning in comparison to the efforts of rural movement and where should the local authority and independence to people moving out, Was actually promote centralization and elimination of local people (something that is acknowledged by some rural researchers). Conclusions rurality in Iran will not build merely because culture abstractions resulting from industrialization and urbanism, with a poetic image and given that the current surplus wealth to the rural and urban economies and in particular Physical and natural aspects as well. In total, the village has a subjective otherness (something that symbolically by government and academic circles attached) And material (something that the old tradition where the current production and exploitation for the benefit of the national economy) Which is located within an alternative discourse with the teachings of modernity (Disregarding the local people and their natural and cultural heritage related to) the identification and analysis. Genealogy such discourse we can see the body of the majority of urban and rural studies have city that was unfamiliar with rural life and the villagers lived space experience With the establishment of the city of alien named emir of the village have made mental cognition And local reactions to external flows are not aware. If you have rural roots kind of subconscious reaction to the suppression of their rural roots. Hence, the rural community in the field of scientific test and consecutive errors by professors, students and experts has been something that has always been the least attention to the folk culture of the people. In general, rural predict the future may by current patterns The patterns are now emerging that emphasize academic circles in the world to be neglected and local capacity malicious behavior considered to be at the micro level.