comparison of microleakage in class v direct composite and ceramic inlay restorations cemented with two different resin cements
Authors
abstract
0
similar resources
Comparison of micro-leakage in class V ceramic inlay restorations cemented with two different resin cements
Comparison of micro-leakage in class V ceramic inlay restorations cemented with two different resin cements Dr. SM. Mousavinasab *- Dr. L. Pishevar * - Dr. T. Aghabeigi ** *Assistant Professor of Operative Dentistry Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Shaheed Sadoughi Yazd University of Medical Sciences. ** Dentist Abstract Background and Aim: Resin cements are usually used for bonding ceramic inlays....
full textMicroleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standardized Class II s...
full textStress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of differences in the resin-cement elastic modulus on stress-transmission to ceramic or resin-based composite inlay-restored Class II MOD cavities during vertical occlusal loading. METHODS Three finite-element (FE) models of Class II MOD cavity restorations in an upper premolar were produced. Model A represented a glass-cerami...
full textMicroleakage evaluation of class V restorations with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of conventional Glass Ionomer Cements (GIC) and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIC). The tested materials were grouped as follows: GIC category - G1 (Vidrion R - SSWhite); G2 (Vitro Fill - DFL); G3 (Vitro Molar - DFL); G4 (Bioglass R - Biodinâmica); and G5 (Ketac Fill - 3M/ESPE); and RMGIC category - G6 (Vitremer ...
full textComparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth.
AIM This in vitro study compared the effect of a concave with a straight-bevelled cavity margin on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS Standardised Class V cavity preparations were made in vitro on the buccal (all margins placed in enamel) and on the lingual (margins placed in enamel and cementum) surfaces of 20 sound primary molars...
full textThe Effect of a Glass Ceramic Insert in Sandwich Technique on Microleakage in Class II Composite Resin Restorations
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of glass ceramic insert in the sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Methods: Sixty sound human upper second premolars were selected and randomly divided into six groups (n=10). Class II box-only cavities were prepared in distal aspects of each tooth with gingival margin located a...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی مشهدجلد ۳۱، شماره ۴، صفحات ۳۲۹-۳۳۴
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023