Wrong Again—Rejoinder to Annas

1. Fenton E, Arras J. Bioethics and human rights: Curb your enthusiasm. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2010;19:127–133 (this issue). 2. Annas GJ. American Bioethics: Crossing Human Rights and Health Law Boundaries. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:xvi. 3. Annas GJ. The American right to health. Hastings Center Report 2009;39(5):3. 4. See note 2, Annas 2005:160–2. See also, e.g., Jonsen A. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. 5. See, generally, Annas GJ, Grodin M. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992; Shuster E. Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 337:1436–40. 6. Fenton E. Liberal eugenics and human nature: Against Habermas. Hastings Center Report 2006;36(6):35–42; Fenton E. Genetic enhancement: A threat to human rights? Bioethics 2008;22(1):1–7. 7. The most persuasive argument on the ‘‘inherent’’ nature of human rights is made by Johannes Morsink in Inherent Human Rights: Philosophical Roots of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2009. Contra, Rawls J. The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999:78–105; and MacIntyre A. After Virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press; 1984:62–78. 8. See, generally, President’s Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics; 2008. See also Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2002:148–77. 9. Rorty R. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin; 1999:85–6; and see Rorty R. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991. 10. See note 2, Annas 2005:35. 11. See, e.g., Hanley R. Is Data Human? The Metaphysics of Star Trek. New York: Basic Books; 1997. 12. Annas GJ, Andrews LB, Isasi RM. Protecting the endangered human: Toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations. American Journal of Law & Medicine 2002;28:151–78. 13. See Isasi RM, Annas GJ. To clone alone: The United Nations’ human cloning declaration. Law and the Human Genome Review 2006;24: 13–26; Isasi RM, Annas GJ. Bioethics and cloning: The ABCs of gestating a United Nations cloning convention. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 2003;35:397–414. 14. See note 2, Annas 2005:37. 15. See note 2, Annas 2005:38. 16. See note 2, Annas 2005:38. 17. See note 2, Annas 2005:40. 18. See also Harris J. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:23–5. 19. MarcuseH.Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press; 1966: 52 (originally published in 1955). 20. See note 19, Maucuse 1966, citing Freud S. Why war? In: Collected Papers V, 273. 21. See note 1, Fenton Arras 2010;19:127–133. 22. See, e.g., Physicians for Human Rights, Aiding Torture: Health Professionals’ Ethics and Human Rights Violations Demonstrated in the May 2004 CIA Inspector General’s Report; available at http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/library/ news-2009-08-31.html (last accessed 31 Aug 2009). 23. Annas GJ. Human rights outlaws: Nuremberg, Geneva, and the Global War on Terrror. Boston University Law Review 2007;87:427–66. 24. Annas GJ. Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster, and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.