Ontology Alignment - Karlsruhe
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce the process of ontology alignment we use for the experiments here. The general process and an efficient algorithm for it have been presented in [ES04b,ES04a]. The presented approach is only capable of extracting semantical identity. Subsumption or complex alignments are currently not supported. To find out whether two entities can be aligned we rely on rules which indicate support for an alignment. A rule consists of two main parts: an entity feature, and a comparison function. The result is a value between 0 and 1. An entity is described through features which are represented in the ontology. A feature can be as simple as the label of entity. It can include intensional structural elements such as superor sub-concepts for concepts, or domain and range for relations. Further we use extensional elements: a concept is described through its instances. Instance features can be instantiated attributes. According to our assumption we restrict our focus on these simple features, where simple means that only directly connected relations are respected, i.e. we do not consider the relations of a sub-concept of a super-concept of a concept. The following example will clarify the used features.
منابع مشابه
State of the Art on Ontology Alignment
In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on sc...
متن کاملD 2 . 2 . 2 : Specification of a benchmarking methodology for alignment techniques
This document considers potential strategies for evaluating ontology alignment algorithms. It identifies various goals for such an evaluation. In the context of the Knowledge web network of excellence, the most important objective is the improvement of existing methods. We examine general evaluation strategies as well as efforts that have already been undergone in the specific field of ontology...
متن کاملD 2 . 2 . 9 : Description of alignment evaluation and benchmarking results
This document discusses its latest advances in ontology matching evaluation: (i) by providing new measures for ontology matching evaluation, such as semantic precision and recall and (ii) by presenting the results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative: OAEI-2006 campaign. Keyword list: ontology matching, ontology alignment, ontology mapping, evaluation, benchmarking, contest, performa...
متن کاملD 2 . 2 . 4 : Alignment implementation and benchmarking results
This deliverable presents the evaluation campaign carried out in 2005 and the improvement participants to these campaign and others have to their systems. We draw lessons from this work and proposes improvements for future campaigns. Keyword list: ontology matching, ontology alignment, ontology mapping, evaluation, benchmarking, contest, performance measure. Copyright c © 2006 The contributors ...
متن کاملD 2 . 2 . 3 : State of the art on ontology alignment
In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on sc...
متن کامل