Evaluation Criteria for Affect-Annotated Databases
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper a set of comprehensive evaluation criteria for affect-annotated databases is proposed. These criteria can be used for evaluation of the quality of a database on the stage of its creation as well as for evaluation and comparison of existing databases. The usefulness of these criteria is demonstrated on several databases selected from affect computing domain. The databases contain different kind of data: video or still images presenting facial expressions, speech recordings and affect-annotated words.
منابع مشابه
Defining evaluation criteria for Health Information Systems using Human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit): systematic review
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of a series of published studies on evaluation of health information systems in order to determine the criteria of evaluation of hospital information systems using HOT-fit framework Information sources or data: The present study is a review study to evaluate articles of English databases PubMed, scupos and Persian databases Irandoc...
متن کاملThe Criteria for Evaluation of the Integration of Information and Communication Technology in the Curriculum: A Systematic Review
Objective: This study aimed to review the criteria for evaluating the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) in the curriculum, and given its significance, provide the necessary assessment recommendations. Material & Methods: This study was a theoretical-systematic review performed with keywords such as "integration," "evaluation," "Information and communication technolo...
متن کاملOptimum Characteristics of Nursing Students’ Clinical Evaluation: Clinical Nursing Teachers’ Viewpoints in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Introduction: Despite importance of evaluating students’ clinical competencies through nursing education program, there is still controversy about optimum characteristics (indices) of clinical evaluation methods and there is no consensus. This study was performed to determine optimum characteristics of clinical competencies’ evaluation and to assess clinical nursing teachers’ viewpoints. Metho...
متن کاملGenome annotation errors in pathway databases due to semantic ambiguity in partial EC numbers
We report on a new type of systematic annotation error in genome and pathway databases that results from the misinterpretation of partial Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers such as '1.1.1.-'. This error results in the assignment of genes annotated with a partial EC number to many or all biochemical reactions that are annotated with the same partial EC number. That inference is faulty because of the...
متن کاملA selection/concatenation text-to-speech synthesis system: databases development, system design, comparative evaluation
This paper describes the development of a new text-tospeech synthesis system in French. The system is based on selection and concatenation of natural speech segments, taken in large annotated speech data bases. In a first part the databases design, content and annotation procedures are presented. It appeared that about 1 hour speech databasesare large enough for a building a TTS system. In a se...
متن کامل