Blockholder Ownership, Dividends and Firm Value
نویسنده
چکیده
Blockholder ownership may increase firm value because of incentive alignment or lower it because of expropriation of minority investors. Dividend policy provides a way to distinguish between the two effects since large owners may prefer low dividends if they derive private benefits from controlling firms, while minority investors may prefer high dividends that benefit all shareholders. I examine the relationship between blockholder ownership, dividend policy and firm value in a panel of the largest EU and US/UK companies 1998-1998. I find a negative effect of blockholder ownership on firm value in continental Europe, which is particularly strong for firms with high reinvestment rates and high equity-asset ratios. No similar effect is found in the US/UK. Moreover, in continental Europe blockholder ownership has a negative effect on dividend payout ratios. The findings indicate that concentrated ownership leads to a preference for retained earnings, which lowers the exchange value of the firm to minority investors. 1 This paper is part of the research project on corporate governance of companies with concentrated ownership GOCOW funded by the Danish Social Science Research Council. 2 The paper has benefited from generous comments from Delia Ionascu, who could easily have been a coauthor. I am grateful to Michael Emil Ollinger for research assistance. 3 Professor. Department of International Economics and Management, Howitzvej 60, 2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark. E-mail [email protected].
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Blockholder Ownership on Firm Value in Market - and Control - Based Governance Systems
We use Granger-tests to examine the causal relationship between blockholder ownership and value of the largest EU and US companies. Previous studies on US data have found no systematic effect, but we propose that these results may not carry over to continental Europe, where ownership concentration is higher, the level of investor protection is lower, and influential blockholders may have other ...
متن کاملCorporate Control and Multiple Large Shareholders∗
Many firms have more than one blockholder, but finance theory suggests that one blockholder should be sufficient to bestow all benefits on a firm that arise from concentrated ownership. This paper identifies a reason why more blockholders may arise endogenously. We consider a setting where multiple shareholders have endogenous conflicts of interest depending on the size of their stake. Such con...
متن کاملCorporate Control and Multiple Large
Recent evidence on financial structures within firms suggests that concentrated ownership in the form of several large shareholders, rather than dispersed ownership, is the norm. This is puzzling given that often the stakes are too big for optimal diversification and too small to guarantee control. This paper attempts to provide an explanation. We consider a setting where multiple shareholders ...
متن کاملOwnership structure, Voting and Risk
We analyze the determinants of ownership structure in firms when conflicts of interest on risk arise endogenously via different ownership stakes and firm decisions are made through majority voting. A large block is chosen to incentivize monitoring. Because a large blockholder holds a large share of the firm, he is averse to risky investing. This generates a conflict of interest with dispersed s...
متن کاملInvestigating the relationship among information asymmetry, dividend policy and ownership structure
The purpose of a financial manager in dividend policy is to maximize the wealth of its owners while providing adequate funds for the company. In this research, the aim is to determine the relationship between information asymmetry, dividend policies and ownership structure. After designing information asymmetry evaluation indicators, the transaction information has been collected from the Stock...
متن کامل