Envy can promote more equal division in alternating-offer bargaining
نویسنده
چکیده
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss caused by receiving the smaller share that is modeled in some social preferences in addition to self-interest. I extend Rubinstein (1982)’s original solution of the bargaining problem for two self-interested bargainers to this strategic situation. Bargainers still reach agreement in the first period and their bargaining shares increase in the strength of their own envy. As both bargainers’ envy diminishes, the agreed partition converges to the Rubinstein division. If equally patient bargaining parties exhibit similar envy, then the agreed partition is tilted away from the Rubinstein division towards the equal division. Notably, the potential sensation of envy also boosts the share of the eventually envy-free party who leaves the bargaining with the larger share under the agreed partition. This gain in bargaining strength through envy can result in a bargaining outcome that is more unequal than predicted by the Rubinstein division.
منابع مشابه
Incomplete Information about Social Preferences Explains Equal Division and Delay in Bargaining
Two deviations of alternating-offer bargaining behavior from economic theory are observed together, yet have been studied separately. Players who could secure themselves a large surplus share if bargainers were purely self-interested incompletely exploit their advantage. Delay in agreement occurs even if all experimentally controlled information is common knowledge. This paper rationalizes both...
متن کاملAsymmetric Inequality Aversion and Noisy Behavior in Alternating-Offer Bargaining Games
In two-stage bargaining games with alternating offers, the amount of the pie that remains after a rejection is what the first player should offer to the second player, since the second player can capture this remainder in the final (ultimatum) stage. Fairness considerations will reduce the correlation between first-stage offers and the size of the remaining pie, but randomness in behavior will ...
متن کاملDelay in the alternating-offers model of bargaining
Alternating offers bargaining has been extensively used to model two-sided negotiations. The celebrated model of Rubinstein (1982) has provided a formal justification for equitable payoff division. A typical assumption of these models under risk is that the termination event means a complete and irrevocable breakdown in negotiations. In this paper, the meaning of termination is reinterpreted as...
متن کاملBargaining, interdependence, and the rationality of fair division
We consider two-person bargaining games with interdependent preferences and bilateral incomplete information. We show that in both the ultimatum game and the two-stage alternating-offers game, our equilibrium predictions are consistent with a number of robust experimental regularities that falsify the standard game-theoretic model: occurrence of disagreements, disadvantageous counteroffers, and...
متن کاملAlternating Offer Bargaining with Endogenous Information*
Two ex ante identically informed agents play an alternating offer bargaining game with endogenous information acquisition and common values. This paper shows that perfect Bayesian equilibria may have the following properties. (i) No agreement exists in ultimatum bargaining although both agents maintain symmetric information in equilibrium and the gain from trade is common knowledge. (ii) The ag...
متن کامل