Selecting judgment aggregation rules for NAO robots: an experimental approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social choice rules can be used to reach group decisions in multiagent systems. We consider judgment aggregation, the problem of aggregating answers to binary logically related questions. In general ”fairness” is usually considered to be the main concern when selecting a social choice rule, however we believe that in judgment aggregation often a more relevant property is how efficient the rule is in truth tracking, that is, how often does it return the correct answer to the binary questions. Whereas “fairness” can be studied axiomatically, truth tracking efficiency needs to be studied experimentally. We accomplish the experimental analysis by constructing a multi-robot system.
منابع مشابه
Judgment Aggregation for Cooperative Anchoring on the NAO Robots
Cooperative anchoring is the sharing of associations between symbols and sensor data across multi robot systems. We apply the solution of Judgment Aggregation, a logic based collective-decision making framework from social choice theory to the problem of cooperative anchoring in terms of information fusion. We model a multi-agent system comprising of nao robots on a search exercise using its vi...
متن کاملDistance-Based Judgment Aggregation of Three-Valued Judgments with Weights
Judgment aggregation theory studies how to amalgamate individual opinions on a set of logically related issues into a set of collective opinions. Aggregation rules proposed in the literature are sparse. All proposed rules consider only two-valued judgments, thus imposing the strong requirement that an agent cannot abstain from giving judgments on any of the issues. All proposed rules are also i...
متن کاملScoring rules for judgment aggregation
This paper introduces a new class of judgment aggregation rules, to be called scoring rules after their famous counterparts in preference aggregation theory. A scoring rule generates the collective judgment set which reaches the highest total scoreacross the individuals, subject to the judgment set having to be rational. Depending on how we de ne scores, we obtain several (old and new) so...
متن کاملA partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
The literature on judgment aggregation has now been moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we focus on a family of rules that is the natural counterpart of the family of Condorcetconsistent voting rules: majority-preserving judgment aggregation rules. A judgment aggregation rule is majority-preserving if ...
متن کاملBayesian interaction shaping: learning to influence strategic interactions in mixed robotic domains
Despite recent advances in getting autonomous robots to follow instructions from humans, strategically intelligent robot behaviours have received less attention. Strategic intelligence entails influence over the beliefs of other interacting agents, possibly adversarial. In this paper, we present a learning framework for strategic interaction shaping in physical robotic systems, where an autonom...
متن کامل