Who Helps DeShawn Register to Vote ? A Field Experiment on State Legislators
نویسندگان
چکیده
We contribute to the understanding of political inequality in the U.S. by investigating whether state legislators are less responsive to requests for help with registering to vote made by blacks relative to identical requests made by whites. To answer this question we conducted a field experiment in October 2008 where approximately 6,000 state legislators were e-mailed. In the experiment we randomized whether the e-mail was sent using a putatively black alias or a putatively white alias. We also randomized whether the email signaled the sender’s partisan preference (Democrat or Republican), or signaled nothing about their partisan preference. At first, we found that Democratic legislators ostensibly do not engage in differential treatment while Republican legislators are more responsive to requests made by the white alias. The majority of this differential treatment persists when partisanship is signaled, indicating that strategic partisan concerns do not completely account for the observed differences. However, taking into consideration the race of the legislators reveals that white legislators of both parties exhibit similar, significant levels of differential treatment against the black alias. Both black and non-black minority legislators do the opposite. This provides evidence that the race of elected officials significantly affects how effectively minorities are represented.
منابع مشابه
“Hearing from All Sides” How Legislative Testimony Influences State Level Policy-Makers in the United States
Background This paper investigates whether state legislators find testimony influential, to what extent testimony influences policy-makers’ decisions, and defines the features of testimony important in affecting policy-makers’ decisions. Methods We used a mixed method approach to analyze responses from 862 state-level legislators in the United States (U.S.). Data were collected via a phone su...
متن کاملThe Effects of Redistricting on Incumbents1
We analyze the effects of redistricting on the electoral fortunes of incumbent legislators, using voting data on U.S. congressional districts, state legislative districts, and statewide races. We find little evidence that redistricting helps incumbents in U.S. legislative elections. If anything, redrawing district lines reduces the average vote margin of those in districted offices compared wit...
متن کاملHow a Firm Can Induce Legislators to Adopt a Bad Policy
This paper shows why a majority of legislators may vote for a policy that benefits a firm but harms all legislators. The firm may induce legislators to support the policy by suggesting that it is more likely to invest in a district whose voters or representative support the policy. In equilibrium, no one vote may be decisive, so each legislator who seeks the firm’s investment votes for the poli...
متن کاملState legislators' beliefs about legislation that restricts youth access to tobacco products.
Better understanding of the cognitive framework for decision making among legislators is important for advocacy of health-promoting legislation. In 1994, the authors surveyed state legislators from North Carolina, Texas, and Vermont concerning their beliefs and intentions related to voting for a hypothetical measure to enforce legislation preventing the sale of tobacco to minors, using scales b...
متن کامل"Hearing from all sides" How legislative testimony influences state level policy-makers in the United States.
BACKGROUND This paper investigates whether state legislators find testimony influential, to what extent testimony influences policy-makers' decisions, and defines the features of testimony important in affecting policy-makers' decisions. METHODS We used a mixed method approach to analyze responses from 862 state-level legislators in the United States (U.S.). Data were collected via a phone su...
متن کامل