Comparison of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE)and Abdominal - Perineal Resection (APR)
نویسندگان
چکیده
To compare the difference between the extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) and abdominal perineal resection (APR) in circum ferencial resection margin (CRM) positive rate, intraoperative perforation (IOP) the incidence of postoperative wound infection, incision infection reoperation rate, surgical indications, operation time, hemorrhage volume, the recurrence rate, postoperative quality of life (perineal pain, urinary and reproductive function). By searching the literature about ELAPE and APR , reviewed their clinical value. ELAPE has greater advantages in reducing the CRM ,IOP and the recurrence rate in patients with low colorectal cancer , lowert he hemorrhage volume than the APR, but surgical area larger defects appear perineal pain, increase the incidence of urinary and reproductive dysfunction, and longer operative time with respect to the APR. APR is the first choice for low colorectal cancer patient with cT1 ~ 2 or ycT0 ~ 2 period ; after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyand tumor stage ycT3 ~ 4 stage patients ELAPE is more appropriate, ELAPE in postoperative complications, postoperative quality of life aspect is also worth to wait.
منابع مشابه
Biologic Mesh Reconstruction of the Pelvic Floor after Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the evidence for the use of biologic mesh in the reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (ELAPE). METHODS A systematic search of PubMed was conducted using the search terms: "ELAPE," "extralevator abdominoperineal excision of rectum," or "extralevator abdominoperineal resecti...
متن کاملApplication of Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer
BACKGROUND When compared with conventional abdominoperineal resection (APR), extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of local recurrence for the treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer. Combined with the laparoscopic technique, laparoscopic ELAPE (LELAPE) has the potential to reduce invasion and hasten postoperative recovery. In this study...
متن کاملExtralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
OBJECTIVE Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) reduces the risk of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and of intraoperative perforation (IOP), both of which are associated with high local recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the results of ELAPE with conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal ...
متن کاملComparative study of extralevator vs. conventional abdominoperineal excision in a single centre in the developing world.
ABSTRACT Abdominoperineal excision (APE) is used to resect cancers in the distal rectum and anus where sphincterpreserving surgery is not possible. It is associated with increased local recurrence rates compared to anterior resection. The extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) was developed to reduce local recurrence and was widely adopted without sound evidence. AIM To compare the sh...
متن کاملExtralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position
The Miles operation is every day more in the limelight. The abdominoperineal resection compared to anterior resection results in increased rate of circumferential resection margin (CRM) infiltration, increased iatrogenic tumor perforation rate and poorer quality of the mesorectum. These worse results may be caused by excessive dissection between the distal mesorectum and the plane of the levato...
متن کامل