People, practice, and technology: Restoring Giddens' broader philosophy to the study of information systems

In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Available online xxxx This paper argues that practice-based management and IS literature has tended to portray a voluntaristic account of human agency that downplays the contribution to emergent social outcomes of more deeply rooted psychological dimensions of the human condition. Within the IS research community, this tendency is exemplified in work using Giddens' structuration theory, which, whilst acknowledging the importance of human interpretive properties, has foregrounded cogni-tive aspects to interpretation at the expense of important non-cognitive ingredients such as affect and biographical identity. These non-cognitive ingredients are less amenable for study using the structurational model, but receive comprehensive treatment elsewhere in Giddens' work. Accordingly, it is argued that a useful direction for future theory development would be to seek a more balanced account of humans' co-constitutive relationship with technology in practice. This could be achieved by supplementing the structurational perspective, with its primary focus on emergent social structure, with a more explicit engagement with Giddens' broader concern with emergent biographical structure. An initial integrative framework is offered as a first step in this direction. 1. Introduction: how we feel about our selves matters Within management research, theories of practice in which social life is viewed as emergent and enacted are increasingly challenging representationalist depictions of organizations and organizational knowledge (for summaries, see Thompson, 2011; Tsoukas, 1996). Management and IS researchers have achieved much in applying social theory to open up apparently fixed entities — people, organizational routines, information systems, hierarchies — showing these instead to be emergent, contestible processes,