Organizational design principles and techniques for decision-theoretic agents
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent research has shown how an organization can influence a decision-theoretic agent by replacing one or more of its model components (transition/reward functions, action/state spaces, etc.), and how each of these influences impacts the agent’s decision-making performance. This paper delves more precisely into exactly which parts of an agent’s model should be organizationally influenced, and asserts a broader principle for delineating what aspects of an agent’s behavior an organization should be sanctioned to influence. We present a formal framework for specifying factored organizational influences and incorporating them into agents’ decision models, and empirically demonstrate that organizational specifications based on our proposed principle outperform the alternatives. We further describe an algorithm for automating the organizational-design process that is inspired by this principle, and demonstrate empirically that its organizational designs are both intuitively sensible and also find and exploit domain structure that our hand-generated designs miss.
منابع مشابه
A decision-theoretic characterization of organizational influences
Despite a large body of research on integrating organizational concepts into cooperative multiagent systems, a formal understanding of how organizations can influence agents’ decisions remains elusive. This paper works toward such an understanding by beginning with a model of agent decision making based on decision-theoretic principles, and then examining the possible routes that organizational...
متن کاملCreating Socially Conscious Agents: Decision-Making in the Context of Group Commitments
With growing opportunities for individually motivated agents to work collaboratively to satisfy shared goals, it becomes increasingly important to design agents that can make intelligent decisions in the context of commitments to group activities. In particular, agents need to be able to reconcile their intentions to do group-related actions with other, connicting actions. In this thesis, I pre...
متن کاملOrganizational Architectures for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems' Development: An Initial Ontology
An initial conceptualization of organizational design techniques for large-scale multi-agent systems (LSMAS) based on the paradigm of organizational architecture is introduced. Seven perspectives (organizational structure, processes, culture, strategy, individual agents, organizational agents and inter-organizational context) are analyzed and dened. By using a graph theoretic approach and recur...
متن کاملMultiagent Metareasoning through Organizational Design
We formulate an approach to multiagent metareasoning that uses organizational design to focus each agent’s reasoning on the aspects of its local problem that let it make the most worthwhile contributions to joint behavior. By employing the decentralized Markov decision process framework, we characterize an organizational design problem that explicitly considers the quantitative impact that a de...
متن کاملSelectively Injecting Organizational Influences into Decision-Theoretic Agents
In this paper, we summarize our prior work on exerting organizational influence on a decision-theoretic agent by replacing components of its Dec-POMDP model. We show how replacing various components can correspond to different prior notions of organizational control, and summarize the impact that different replacements can have on the quality and overhead of coordinated behavior. The innovation...
متن کامل