Cognitive Differences Between High and Low Responders of a Tier II Reading Intervention
نویسندگان
چکیده
............................................................................................................. LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................. iii viii ix CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 Background................................................................................................................... ............. 1 Learning Disabilities................................................................................ ............................... 2 Response to Intervention (RTI)......................................................................................... 3 Integrating Cognitive Assessment.................................................................................... 6 Theoretical Framework behind Cognitive Assessment........................................... 9 Rationale.............................................................................................................. 2 Purpose of the Study......................................................................................................... ...... 3 Research Questions........................................................................................................... 3 Limitations of Previous Research.................................................................... ........... 4 CHAPTER 2—LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................................... 5 Introduction................................................................................................................. ............... 5 Factors Underlying Reading Deficits................................................................................ 6 Cognitive Characteristics of Non-Responsive Students........................................... 8 The Role of Assessment....................................................................................................... .. 1 Linking Cognitive Processes to Reading Achievement............................................ 2 Early Reading Interventions........................................................................................... 9 Addressing Gaps in the Literature................................................................................. 0 Educational Implications of an Assessment to Intervention Model................... 4
منابع مشابه
Remediating Reading Difficulties in a Response to Intervention Model with Secondary Students.
The research on Response to Intervention (RtI) with secondary students is scant; however, a recently conducted, multiyear, large-scale implementation of RtI with middle-school students provides findings that inform practices and future directions for research. This article provides an overview of the findings from each of the 3 years of an intensive, tiered reading intervention with middle-scho...
متن کاملMeta-Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension among Iranian EFL Learners of Varying Levels of Proficiency
This study explored the use of meta-cognitive strategies (MCS) in reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners with varying levels of proficiency (i.e. high proficient vs. low proficient). Furthermore, there was an attempt to investigate the impact of motivation on language learners’ MCS use. The proposed hypotheses predicted: 1) there is no significant difference between the high proficien...
متن کاملEfficacy of a First - Grade Responsiveness - to - Intervention Prevention Model for Struggling Readers
This randomized control trial examined the efficacy of a multitiered supplemental tutoring program within a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model. Struggling first-grade readers (n = 649) were screened and progress monitored at the start of the school year. Those identified as unresponsive to general education Tier 1 (n = 212) were randomly assigned to receive Tier 2 small...
متن کاملReading Comprehension Ability and Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among High, Mid and Low Ambiguity Tolerance EAP Students
This study examined the differences among high, mid and low ambiguity tolerance groups in their reading comprehension ability and their metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. To this end, 123 first-year college students majoring in Engineering with an age range of 19-25 were stratified into three groups of high, mid and low ambiguity tolerance to participate in the study. They took part...
متن کاملRelationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Strategy Use and Emotional Intelligence
Abstract This study aimed at investigating the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ reading strategy use and Emotional Intelligence (EI) as well as exploring the most frequently-used reading strategies which can facilitate the process of reading comprehension. To this end, a group of 60 was selected out of 274 university learners majoring in TEFL and English Translation. Based on English ...
متن کامل