Altruists, Egoists, and Hooligans in a Local Interaction Model
نویسندگان
چکیده
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].. American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Economic Review.
منابع مشابه
Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior
A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic reputation and receive future benefits from third parties. Accordingly, individuals should stop inve...
متن کاملOrigin and Structure of Dynamic Cooperative Networks
Societies are built on social interactions among individuals. Cooperation represents the simplest form of a social interaction: one individual provides a benefit to another one at a cost to itself. Social networks represent a dynamical abstraction of social interactions in a society. The behaviour of an individual towards others and of others towards the individual shape the individual's neighb...
متن کاملEvolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection
The evolution of parochial altruism is not well understood. We study this problem by considering a prisoner's dilemma game with four strategies: altruists who cooperate with everyone; parochialists who only cooperate with members of their own group; traitors who only cooperate with outgroup individuals; and egoists who never cooperate. We develop a model that allows for both assortment and conf...
متن کاملStrategic Behavior of Moralists and Altruists
Does altruism and morality lead to socially better outcomes in strategic interactions than selfishness? We shed some light on this complex and non-trivial issue by examining a few canonical strategic interactions played by egoists, altruists and moralists. By altruists, we mean people who do not only care about their own material payoffs but also about those to others, and, by a moralist, we me...
متن کاملEvolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: a critique of Sober and Wilson’s argument for psychological altruism
Sober and Wilson have propose a cluster of arguments for the conclusion that ‘‘natural selection is unlikely to have given us purely egoistic motives’’ and thus that psychological altruism is true. I maintain that none of these arguments is convincing. However, the most powerful of their arguments raises deep issues about what egoists and altruists are claiming and about the assumptions they ma...
متن کامل