Autonomy, paternalism, and the doctor's duty of care.
نویسنده
چکیده
Autonomy, paternalism, and the doctor 's duty of care Everything has its season, and there is a time for everything under the heavens: A time to be born and a time to die. .. A time to be silent and a time to speak. Ecclesiastes 3:1–7 Medicine constantly holds the tensions of contrasts. Of life and of death. Of fighting and of folding. Of truth and of deceit. Herein lies the art of medicine. Holding the balance of the rational advance of science against the relative world of values and attitudes. This tension, in turn, ref lects the human condition, wherein man is both symbolic and physical. Some time ago I had a case that brought these issues into sharp relief. I had been asked to consult on an 86-year-old Russian lady who spoke only a few words of English. She had a slowly advancing head and neck tumor for which no further antitu-mour treatment was possible. She had neuropathic pain, which settled with a tincture of anticonvul-sant. At the first consultation her son pushed urgently in front of her and whispered emphatically to me, " Do not tell her that she has cancer. If she knows, it will kill her. " I nodded neutrally. After 15 minutes of preliminaries, she blurted out in broken English, " Do I have cancer? " There was no time to ref lect as in an editorial—there was no interpreter to impartially dissect the question—and the son's presence loomed large. I simply did not know her. I answered her in a ref lex, as these thoughts f lashed through my mind. Robert Twycross, the British doyen of palliative medicine, recently wrote about the challenge of " truthful communication between health professionals and patients. " ~Twycross, 2006!. He cites the literature and 30 years of clinical experience to conclude that " although truth may hurt, deceit hurts more. " And that " a conspiracy of silence or of words " leads to " desolation, depersonalization. .. and suffering " of the patient. Telling the truth ~or not! has a particular ethical framework. A broader paradigm that incorporates truth telling would be of autonomy and paternal-ism. Should I, the doctor, paternalistically decide what information to reveal or to conceal? A common defense for not telling the truth to the patient and deferring to the family is that the ethical and social unit is the family, not …
منابع مشابه
Ethical considerations for the development of Decision Support Systems
This paper is extracted from a dissertation submitted as part of the MA in Medical Ethics at Keele University 2004. 1 Introduction Decision making in the doctor-patient relationship will inevitably be a balance between the patient's right to control his or her own life (" autonomy ") and the doctor's duty to choose and prescribe the best course of treatment for the patient (" paternalism ") 1. ...
متن کاملچالشهای استقلال بیماران بستری: یک تحقیق کیفی
Patient autonomy is the opposite of paternalism and an essential element in individualised, patient-centred, ethical care. Challenges associated with patient autonomy are culture-related and have not been fully investigated in Iran so far. The aim of this study was to explore the challenges to the autonomy of patients in Iranian hospitals.This was a qualitative study using conventional content ...
متن کاملWhen open-ended questions don't work: the role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions.
Abstract The balance between patient autonomy and medical paternalism must be reexamined. The tension between autonomy and paternalism is both an ethical and practical issue. Autonomy is the current gold standard approach to patient communication and has grown to the point that patient preference dictates care, even when their choices are not possible or are medically nonbeneficial. Furthermore...
متن کاملPaternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care
BACKGROUND Psychiatric staff members have the power to decide the options that frame encounters with patients. Intentional as well as unintentional framing can have a crucial impact on patients' opportunities to be heard and participate in the process. We identified three dominant ethical perspectives in the normative medical ethics literature concerning how doctors and other staff members shou...
متن کاملAutonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill.
Following the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O'Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revisi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Palliative & supportive care
دوره 4 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006