Reply to Corbeil et al.: Dedifferentiation and multipotency.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We thank Corbeil et al. for raising important points (1) regarding our recent article (2) describing the role of epithelial dedifferentiation in kidney repair. We agree that the forward primer we used to detect CD133 mRNA is in fact not directed against the CD133 transcript. This error resulted from the original primer order in which we mistakenly transcribed an unrelated sequence. Surprisingly, this primer pair did amplify a product with a single peak by quantitative PCR, and that is what we reported in figure 3f of our report (2). We sincerely regret this mistake and appreciate that Corbeil et al. detected it. We have now repeated the quantitative PCR for CD133 on the same samples using specific primers, and the results are shown in Fig. 1. CD133 is up-regulated after ischemia, but to a lower degree than in our original report. Colon was used as a positive control because CD133 is abundantly expressed on colonic epithelia (3). We are submitting an erratum to PNAS to replace the incorrect results with these newer ones. In human kidney, the AC133 mAb detects glycosylated CD133 protein in a scattered population of tubular cells and these have been proposed to be stem cells. This antibody does not cross-react with mouse, however, as we stated (4). The observation by Corbeil et al. (1) that the pan-CD133 antibody 13A4 does not detect the CD133 protein in the proximal convoluted tubules is intriguing. Note that the SLC34a1-CreER driver we created is expressed primarily in the proximal convoluted tubule (S1 and S2 segments) with lower expression in the proximal straight tubule (S3 segment). Therefore, the up-regulation of CD133 mRNA in cells from the proximal convoluted tubule is consistent with up-regulation of CD133 in dedifferentiating epithelia. We agree that strong expression of CD133 in healthy kidney is inconsistent with the notion that it exclusively marks a stem cell population. Indeed, a primary conclusion of our genetic lineage analysis is that there is no scattered population of preexisting epithelial stem cells but, rather, terminally differentiated cells repair injury through dedifferentiation (2). It has recently been shown that differentiated lung epithelial cells can dedifferentiate into functional stem cells, highlighting the plasticity of differentiated cells (5). Whether CD133 plays a role in this process in kidney or simply defines cells undergoing injuryinduced dedifferentiation are important questions for future investigation.
منابع مشابه
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
متن کاملEnvironmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)
Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...
متن کاملLetter to editor
Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...
متن کاملOn Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al
Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
دوره 111 15 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014