Orthodontic forced eruption: Possible effects on maxillary canines and adjacent teeth Part 3: Dentoalveolar ankylosis, replacement resorption, calcific metamorphosis of the pulp and aseptic pulp necrosis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Canine forced eruption comprises one among a number of procedures that can be used in orthodontic treatment to ensure that cuspids are positioned in the dental arch in normal esthetic and functional conditions. Canine forced eruption should be characterized as an orthodontic movement. Unfortunately, in discussions of clinical orthodontic practice some professionals are reluctant to indicate orthodontic forced eruption, especially of maxillary canines. These professionals believe that orthodontic forced eruption can cause many clinical problems during and after surgery. Among the most widely cited reasons for restricting the indication of orthodontic forced eruption are: 1) Lateral root resorption in lateral incisors and premolars. 2) External cervical resorption of canines due to forced eruption. 3) Dentoalveolar ankylosis of the canine involved in the process. 4) Calcific metamorphosis of the pulp and aseptic pulp necrosis. In two previous works, we reviewed the first two topics. In this last article in the series we address the biological foundation of dentoalveolar ankylosis, replacement resorption, calcific metamorphosis of the pulp and aseptic necrosis cases either directly or indirectly related to the orthodontic forced eruption of canines.
منابع مشابه
Orthodontic traction: possible effects on maxillary canines and adjacent teeth Part 2: External cervical resorption due to canine traction
Professionals who resist and restrict the indication of orthodontic traction, especially canine traction, often justify their stance by citing the following reasons: 1) Lateral Root Resorption in lateral incisors and premolars. 2) External Cervical Resorption of canines due to canine traction. 3) Alveolodental ankylosis of the canine(s) involved in the process. 4) Calcific metamorphosis of the ...
متن کاملOrthodontic traction: Possible consequences for maxillary canines and adjacent teeth Part 1: Root resorption in lateral incisors and premolars
Some professionals are reluctant to indicate orthodontic traction, especially for upper canines. Among the most common reasons for restricting the indication of orthodontic traction are: 1) Root resorption in lateral incisors and premolars. 2) External cervical resorption of the canines under traction. 3) Alveolodental ankylosis of the canine(s) involved in the process. 4) Calcific metamorphosi...
متن کاملWhy not to treat the tooth canal to solve external root resorptions? Here are the principles!
This paper aims at exposing the foundations or reasons why, in cases of external tooth resorption, including those of orthodontic origin, one should not perform a root canal to treat it. That should be done only to teeth with contamination or pulp necrosis, to remove the periapical inflammation induced by microbial products. When facing cases of external tooth resorption, one's conduct must alw...
متن کاملIntrusive luxation of permanent incisors in Norwegians aged 6-17 years: a retrospective study of treatment and outcome.
BACKGROUND/AIM External replacement resorption (ankylosis-related) is a severe complication leading eventually to tooth loss. Little information exists regarding the influence of variables such as degree of intrusion or treatment method on the development of replacement resolution in intruded permanent incisors. The aim of this study was to report the most frequently involved age group, the pre...
متن کاملتأثیر متقابل درمانهای اندودنتیک و ارتودنتیک
The purpose of this article was reviewing the literature related to the mutual effects of endodontics and orthodontics on each other providing documented information that can be used by dentists in clinical practice. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the dental pulp and its role in root resorption, the influence of previous trauma to the tooth and endodontic treatment in orthodontic tooth ...
متن کامل