The Max k-Cut Game and Its Strong Equilibria
نویسندگان
چکیده
An instance of the max k−cut game is an edge weighted graph. Every vertex is controlled by an autonomous agent with strategy space [1..k]. Given a player i, his payoff is defined as the total weight of the edges [i, j] such that player j’s strategy is different from player i’s strategy. The social welfare is defined as the weight of the cut, i.e. half the sum of the players payoff. It is known that this game always has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium, a state from which no single player can deviate. Instead we focus on strong equilibria, a robust refinement of the pure Nash equilibrium which is resilient to deviations by coalitions of any size. We study the strong equilibria of the max k−cut game under two perspectives: existence and worst case social welfare compared to a social optimum.
منابع مشابه
On Strong Equilibria in the Max Cut Game
This paper deals with two games defined upon well known generalizations of max cut. We study the existence of a strong equilibrium which is a refinement of the Nash equilibrium. Bounds on the price of anarchy for Nash equilibria and strong equilibria are also given. In particular, we show that the max cut game always admits a strong equilibrium and the strong price of anarchy is 2/3.
متن کاملNear-Strong Equilibria in Network Creation Games
We introduce a new solution concept for games, near-strong equilibrium, a variation of strong equilibrium. Previous work has shown the existence of 2-strong pure strategy equilibrium for network creation games with 1 < α < 2 and that k-strong equilibrium for k ≥ 3 does not exist. In this paper we show that 3-near-strong equilibrium exists, and provide tight bounds on existence of k-near-strong ...
متن کاملMultilevel Network Games
We consider a multilevel network game, where nodes can improve their communication costs by connecting to a high-speed network. The n nodes are connected by a static network and each node can decide individually to become a gateway to the high-speed network. The goal of a node v is to minimize its private costs, i.e., the sum (SUM-game) or maximum (MAXgame) of communication distances from v to ...
متن کاملEquilibria of Generalized Cut and Choose Protocols
Classic cake cutting protocols — which fairly allocate a divisible good among agents with heterogeneous preferences — are susceptible to manipulation. Do their strategic outcomes still guarantee fairness? We model the interaction among agents as a game and study its Nash equilibria. We show that each protocol in the novel class of generalized cut and choose protocols — which includes the most i...
متن کاملBicriteria Optimization in Routing Games
Two important metrics for measuring the quality of routing paths are the maximum edge con-gestion C and maximum path length D. Here, we study bicriteria in routing games where eachplayer i selfishly selects a path that simultaneously minimizes its maximum edge congestion Ciand path length Di. We study the stability and price of anarchy of two bicriteria games:• Max games, where ...
متن کامل