Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting.

نویسندگان

  • Jean-Philippe Collet
  • Thomas Cuisset
  • Grégoire Rangé
  • Guillaume Cayla
  • Simon Elhadad
  • Christophe Pouillot
  • Patrick Henry
  • Pascal Motreff
  • Didier Carrié
  • Ziad Boueri
  • Loic Belle
  • Eric Van Belle
  • Hélène Rousseau
  • Pierre Aubry
  • Jacques Monségu
  • Pierre Sabouret
  • Stephen A O'Connor
  • Jérémie Abtan
  • Mathieu Kerneis
  • Christophe Saint-Etienne
  • Olivier Barthélémy
  • Farzin Beygui
  • Johanne Silvain
  • Eric Vicaut
  • Gilles Montalescot
چکیده

BACKGROUND Patients' responses to oral antiplatelet therapy are subject to variation. Bedside monitoring offers the opportunity to improve outcomes after coronary stenting by individualizing therapy. METHODS We randomly assigned 2440 patients scheduled for coronary stenting at 38 centers to a strategy of platelet-function monitoring, with drug adjustment in patients who had a poor response to antiplatelet therapy, or to a conventional strategy without monitoring and drug adjustment. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization 1 year after stent implantation. For patients in the monitoring group, the VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin point-of-care assays were used in the catheterization laboratory before stent implantation and in the outpatient clinic 2 to 4 weeks later. RESULTS In the monitoring group, high platelet reactivity in patients taking clopidogrel (34.5% of patients) or aspirin (7.6%) led to the administration of an additional bolus of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or aspirin along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during the procedure. The primary end point occurred in 34.6% of the patients in the monitoring group, as compared with 31.1% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.29; P=0.10). The main secondary end point, stent thrombosis or any urgent revascularization, occurred in 4.9% of the patients in the monitoring group and 4.6% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.52; P=0.77). The rate of major bleeding events did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS This study showed no significant improvements in clinical outcomes with platelet-function monitoring and treatment adjustment for coronary stenting, as compared with standard antiplatelet therapy without monitoring. (Funded by Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks and others; ARCTIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00827411.).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Perforation of the tricuspid valve caused by an implanted device lead.

P450 2C19*2 polymorphism with clopidogrel response variability and cardiovascular events in Koreans treated with drug-eluting stents. Heart 2012;98:139–44. 27. Oestreich JH, Smyth SS, Campbell CL. Platelet function analysis: at the edge of meaning. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:217–9. 28. Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R, Blindt R, Angiolillo DJ, Becker R et al. Consensus and future directions on the...

متن کامل

Hemodynamic changes in the basilar artery following stenting.

A 75-year-old man had a 2-week history of recurrent, in crescendo episodes of diplopia, dizziness, dysarthria, and right-sided hemiparesis. Transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) showed a severe proximal basilar artery (BA) stenosis with an enddiastolic flow velocity of 142 cm/sec (figure, A, arrow) confirmed by angiography. BA angioplasty and stent application was performed in view of pers...

متن کامل

Combining warfarin and antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events: is it safe and effective to use just one antiplatelet agent?

AIMS To identify factors associated with the use of single or dual antiplatelet therapy in patients prescribed warfarin following coronary stenting and to investigate whether single (aspirin or thienopyridine) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy plus warfarin leads to an excess of adverse outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS We analysed data from 800 patients with an acute coronary syndrome who underwent ...

متن کامل

High on-treatment platelet reactivity as a risk factor for secondary prevention after coronary stent revascularization: A landmark analysis of the ARCTIC study.

BACKGROUND Individualizing antiplatelet therapy after platelet function testing did not improve outcome after coronary stenting in the Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy Versus a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and of Treatment Interruption Versus Continuation One Year After Stenting (ARCTIC) study. Whether results are dif...

متن کامل

Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting

OBJECTIVES We evaluated safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine and cilostazol after coronary stenting. BACKGROUND Triple antiplatelet therapy might have beneficial effect to prevent thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary stenting. METHODS Patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were divided into dual antiplatelet t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 367 22  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012