Chloroform Citation for Most Recent Iarc Review Iarc
نویسنده
چکیده
Exposures to chloroform via showering, bathing, and swimming have been characterized much better since 1999, and these studies show that blood levels are usually higher via these routes than via drinking chlorinated water (Xu & Weisel, 2005; Caro & Gallego, 2007; Zwiener et al., 2007). Chloroform exposure has also been documented in various occupations (Ruder, 2006) and in microenvironments, such as restaurants (Loh et al., 2006). Chloroform exposure also may be occurring when people use triclosan-containing antibacterial soaps (Fiss et al., 2007).
منابع مشابه
Delivered Electronically
The American Chemistry Council commends the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for soliciting widespread review by the scientific community as a whole on the draft language under consideration for revision of the IARC Preamble to the IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. The IARC Monograph process is widely recognized for its contribution over the la...
متن کاملAtrazine Citation for Most Recent Iarc Review
Current evaluation Conclusions from the previous Monograph: Atrazine is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3). There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of atrazine. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of atrazine. The Working Group concluded that the animal mammary tumors associated with exposure to atrazine...
متن کاملPresentation of Study Results: The Authors’ Responsibility
Environmental Health Perspectives • volume 120 | number 9 | September 2012 A 343 due to disease misclassification, we (Camargo et al. 2011) concluded that our meta-analysis supports the IARC classification. This illustrates again that meta-analyses are not free from subjective decisions and interpretations. In conclusion, meta-analyses are a quantitative statistical tool that, in some instances...
متن کاملCommentary: IARC Monographs Program and public health under siege by corporate interests.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluates causes of cancer with help from independent international experts in an open and transparent manner. Countries, research and regulatory agencies, and other organizations adopt IARC evaluations for communication of human cancer hazards, and for strategies to prevent cancer. Scientists worldwide endorse IARC cancer evaluations and p...
متن کاملIARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans
BACKGROUND Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Programme for the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans has been criticized for several of its evaluations, and also for the approach used to perform these evaluations. Some critics have claimed that failures of IARC Working Groups to recognize study weaknesses and biases of Working Group members have led to inappr...
متن کامل