Establishing inter-hospital comparisons of outcomes.

نویسنده

  • R Cleary
چکیده

This paper describes the ongoing development of a region-wide system for monitoring the short-term outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. The system aims to collect data from a dozen hospitals, and relies on a close collaboration with locally based surgeons and medical audit staff. The intention is to provide routine comparative information based on a broad conception of outcome, that includes both clinical/technical measures and patient-derived assessments of general health status. These data may be reported in the context of relatively detailed case mix information. To date, both data capture and clinical support for the project have been good. Example reports are presented together with a discussion of current limitations and possible future developments.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Risk adjustment for cesarean delivery rates: how many variables do we need? An observational study using administrative databases

BACKGROUND Various studies indicate that inter-hospital comparisons have to take case mix into account and that risk adjustment procedures are necessary to control for potential predictors of cesarean delivery (CD). Different data sources have been used to retrieve information on potential predictors of CD. The aim of this study was to compare the discrimination capacity and fit of predictive m...

متن کامل

Nipple Reconstruction Using the C-V Flap Technique: Long-Term Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND Nipple creation using the C-V flap technique is often the final step in breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to subjectively and objectively assess the cosmetic outcomes and satisfaction of patients undergoing C-V flap nipple reconstruction. METHODS Subjective assessments of patient satisfaction with the neo-nipple were recorded by visual analogue scoring (VAS; 0...

متن کامل

Clinical Outcomes after Microdiscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Single-Center Study

Background: Revision discectomy is the principal procedure for recurrent lumbar disk herniation (RLDH). The clinicaloutcomes after this procedure are as good as or slightly poorer than those produced by primary discectomy. In thisstudy, the clinical outcomes of patients treated with microsurgical discectomy for RLDH were analyzed.Methods: We examined 179 patients undergoing lumbar microdiscecto...

متن کامل

Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals

BACKGROUND Hospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve the prediction of health outcomes and reduce confounding in inter-hospital comparisons. The objectiv...

متن کامل

Risk Adjustment for Inter-Hospital Comparison of Caesarean Delivery Rates in Low-Risk Deliveries

BACKGROUND Caesarean delivery (CD) rates have been frequently used as quality measures for maternity service comparisons. More recently, primary CD rates (CD in women without previous CD) or CD rates within selected categories such as nulliparous, term, cephalic singleton deliveries (NTCS) have been used. The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which risk adjustment for clinic...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

دوره 6 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1994