Rational Actors , Political Argument , and Democratic Deliberation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The role of deliberation in collective decision-making - on explanatory mechanisms and the epistemics of rational reason
What is the explanatory potential of deliberation in a political context of collective decisionmaking? This paper posits actors‟ ability to comply with the force of the better argument through explication of the relevant deliberative warrants and through mechanisms for the activation of institutional status functions. It establishes a conceptual scheme for analysing successful processes of deli...
متن کاملModest Praise for Political Deliberation Elogio modesto a la deliberación política
This text analyzes the relationship between political deliberation and democracy. Its content differs both from a scarcely normative idea of competitive politics, predominant in contemporary Political Science, and from a philosophical defense of the deliberation, founded on an idea of common reasonability or on an ideal of communicative speech. The central argument of the author is that deliber...
متن کاملHealthcare Priority-Setting: Chat-Ting Is Not Enough; Comment on “Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage”
CHAT has its limits. It is a three-hour exercise. However, the real world problems of healthcare rationing and priority-setting are too complex for a three-hour exercise. What is needed, as a supplement, are sustained processes of rational democratic deliberation that can address the challenges to healthcare justice posed by costly emerging medical technologies, such as these targeted cancer th...
متن کاملModelling Democratic Deliberation
Deliberative democracy is a political theory that places deliberation at the heart of political decision making. In a deliberation, people justify their preferences to one another. They are confronted with new information and new perspectives, which might lead them to change their preferences. Therefore, deliberative democracy, unlike social choice theory, takes preferences to be secondary (der...
متن کاملRational Judgement Revisited: Practices of Deliberation in Healthcare Funding Decisions
In this paper, we aim at exploring how rationality may become a practical accomplishment. We maintain that it is not known or adequately understood how organisational actors may actually produce ‘rational judgement’ in practice. We thus examined a context where actors seek to be purposefully rational when making healthcare funding decisions. Building on a focused ethnography of decision making ...
متن کامل