A groove-guided indirect transfer system for lingual brackets.
نویسندگان
چکیده
JCO/JULY 2007 P bracket placement is even more important in lingual orthodontics than with labial appliances.1-5 New bracket systems and more flexible wires have eliminated many positioning problems; examples include Kyung’s Mushroom Bracket Positioner,5 the STb system* developed by Takemoto and Scuzzo,6 Wiechmann’s Transfer Optimized Positioning** (TOP), which produces customized archwires with computer-assisted technology, and the Lingualcare bracket system,*** also developed by Wiechmann.7 Still, accurate placement of lingual brackets requires an effective method of indirect bonding. The most popular bonding systems can be divided into three major categories: 1. Systems in which the brackets are positioned directly on the patient’s pretreatment casts. These include the Torque Angulation Reference Guide† (TARG), the Slot Machine,‡ and the Bond with Equal Specific Thickness†† (BEST) system, later renamed TARG Professional (TARG-Pro).8 Although these techniques minimize laboratory and bonding time, they require expensive equipment and do not use setup casts, which can be helpful tools for diagnosis and case presentation. 2. Systems in which the brackets are initially positioned on a setup cast with an ideal archwire, then transferred to the patient’s mouth using a minitray for each tooth. These eliminate the step of transferring the brackets back to the initial cast, but increase the time required for bonding.8-10 3. Systems in which the brackets are initially positioned on a setup cast, then transferred to the patient’s initial cast for fabrication of a transfer tray. This is a simple, effective method that reduces chairtime in bonding, but requires a precise transfer of the brackets from the setup cast to the initial cast. Prieto and colleagues described such a procedure in 2005, using a red DuraLay‡‡ resin as a guide for the bracket transfer.11 The present article describes a modification of that method that ensures more precise and reliable indirect bonding. The key improvement is a change in the position of the red DuraLay resin: Instead of being placed at the center of the bracket pad, the resin is applied more incisally or cervically, depending on the tooth, thus freeing the bracket from potential interference (Fig. 1).
منابع مشابه
Digital design and manufacturing of the Lingualcare bracket system.
duced in the early 1970s, used conventional labial brackets that were modified by the clinician and bonded directly to the lingual surfaces. Brackets designed specifically for lingual usage1-4 were initially prone to technical problems that made them difficult to use in everyday practice. The development of indirect bonding permitted more precise lingual bracket positioning and reduced the chai...
متن کاملA comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of bracket type on the labiopalatal forces and moments generated in the sagittal plane. Incognito™ lingual brackets (3M Unitek), STb™ lingual brackets (Light Lingual System; ORMCO), and conventional 0.018 inch slot brackets (Gemini; 3M Unitek) were bonded on three identical maxillary acrylic resin models, with a palatally displaced right lateral in...
متن کاملIndirect Bonding in Lingual Orthodontics - a Review
It is difficult to visualize the lingual surfaces of the all tooth, in order to assess the exact Facial axis of the clinical crown (FACC point) . So no matter how accurately brackets are positioned on set-up models, it would be meaningless if these positions were lost during intraoral bracket placement. It is no exaggeration to say that incorrect bracket positioning leads to treatment failure. ...
متن کاملBracket placement in lingual vs labial systems and direct vs indirect bonding.
OBJECTIVE To examine the ultimate accuracy of bracket placement in labial vs lingual systems and in direct vs indirect bonding techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty pretreatment dental casts of 20 subjects were selected. For each dental cast, four types of bracket placement were compared: labial direct (LbD), labial indirect (LbI), lingual direct (LgD), and lingual indirect (LgI). Direct bo...
متن کاملA comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of bracket type on the labiopalatal moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Incognito™ lingual brackets (3M Unitek), STb™ lingual brackets (Light Lingual System; ORMCO), In-Ovation L lingual brackets (DENTSPLY GAC), and conventional 0.018 inch slot brackets (Gemini; 3M Unitek) were bonded on identical maxillary acrylic resin models ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO
دوره 41 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007